{ "meta": { "slug": "aeotool-alternatives", "title": "10 Best AEO Tool Alternatives (2026)", "description": "Looking for the best AEO Tool alternatives? Compare 10 tools for AI visibility tracking. Find the right option to monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and more across 8 platforms.", "publishedDate": "2025-12-16", "lastUpdated": "2026-06-14", "targetToolId": "aeotool", "alternativesCount": 10 }, "author": { "name": "Mack Grenfell", "title": "AI Search Researcher", "url": "https://trakkr.ai/about", "twitter": "mackgrenfell", "linkedin": "mackgrenfell" }, "targetTool": { "id": "aeotool", "name": "AEO Tool", "domain": "aeotool.com", "tagline": "Free AEO utilities", "category": "free-tools", "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$0", "model": "free", "hasFreeTier": true } }, "content": { "intro": "AEO Tool is a solid free schema generator that produces valid markup during the 14-day trial. Its limit is that it stops once the schema is built, offering no view into whether ChatGPT, Claude, or other AI assistants actually use that markup to mention your brand. That gap is why many buyers look for tools that track AI visibility over time. This guide ranks 10 alternatives by price, platform coverage, and monitoring depth. From free one-off audits to full tracking suites, each tool is assessed on what it delivers. Trakkr tops the list for coverage across eight AI platforms paired with prompt-level reporting, citation tracking, and sentiment, making it the natural first stop for teams that need proof their schema work moves the needle.", "whyAlternatives": { "headline": "Why look for an AEO Tool alternative?", "reasons": [ { "title": "It generates, it doesn't watch", "description": "AEO Tool runs a one-off check and hands you markup. It never circles back to tell you whether your AI mentions went up, down, or nowhere after you shipped the change." }, { "title": "One job, one engine's worth of context", "description": "Schema generation is a slice of the work. Knowing where you stand means seeing how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and the rest answer about you — which a markup tool doesn't touch." }, { "title": "No read on the competition", "description": "When a category question gets answered by an assistant, you want to know who got named instead of you. A free utility can't tell you that, and it's usually the part that matters most." }, { "title": "Nothing to act on after the audit", "description": "Basic utilities stop at \"here's your schema\". There's no prompt-level analytics or citation tracking to tell you which queries trigger a mention and where the answer is sourced from." } ] }, "methodology": "Each tool was assessed on the gap AEO Tool leaves open: ongoing monitoring, platform coverage, pricing you can see, and how much the data depth actually helps. Where there were free tiers or demos, they were tried directly. Prices and plan details were checked against public pricing pages in June 2026, and they change often, so reconfirm before you buy.", "selectionCriteria": [ "Fit against the specific jobs teams hire AEO Tool for, not raw feature counts.", "Pricing clarity: public numbers, free tiers, trial access, and realistic budgets.", "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, reporting, and workflows.", "Strength of public evidence: product docs, reviews, and fact-checked data.", "Ability to deliver recurring reports and stakeholder-ready output, not just one-off checks." ], "whyTeamsLeave": [ { "title": "Someone asks \"did it work?\" and you can't answer", "description": "You shipped the schema a month ago. A manager wants to know if it moved anything. With a one-off generator there's no before-and-after to point at, and that question is usually what pushes a team to a tool that tracks." }, { "title": "A competitor starts showing up where you don't", "description": "You notice ChatGPT recommending a rival by name on a query you should own. A markup utility can't explain why, so you go looking for something that monitors the answers, not just the page." }, { "title": "AEO becomes a reporting line, not a one-time task", "description": "Once AI visibility has to appear in a monthly report or a client update, a tool that only runs ad-hoc checks stops being enough. You need history and something you can export." } ], "whoShouldStay": [ { "title": "Schema is genuinely all you need right now", "description": "If your job this quarter is to ship valid FAQ markup and move on, AEO Tool does that for free. Paying for monitoring you won't look at is the wrong trade until the question changes." }, { "title": "You're not ready to track yet", "description": "Early on, the honest move is to fix the obvious gaps before you measure them. If you haven't done the basic optimisation work, a free generator plus a few weeks of effort beats a monitoring subscription with nothing to show it." }, { "title": "Budget is zero and has to stay there", "description": "If there's no spend available at all, stay free, and note that two other tools on this list (Agenxus and AEO Tools Hub) are also free. When you do have budget, Trakkr adds ongoing tracking that the one-off utilities can't." } ], "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit." }, "alternatives": [ { "rank": 1, "tool": { "id": "trakkr", "name": "Trakkr", "domain": "trakkr.ai", "tagline": "AI brand visibility tracking", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Trakkr is the most complete way to move beyond AEO Tool's one-off schema generation. It tracks eight AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, and Grok. This is the broadest engine coverage in this list. Instead of a single blended score, Trakkr reports at the prompt level, showing the exact questions that trigger your brand mention. It tracks citations, so you see where answers are sourced, and includes sentiment analysis to gauge tone. For teams that want to know whether their schema optimization actually influenced AI responses, Trakkr provides the proof over time. Paid plans start with a 14-day trial.", "strengths": [ "Tracks eight AI platforms including newer engines like Gemini and Grok.", "Broadest engine coverage of any tool in this list.", "Provides prompt-level visibility to see which questions trigger mentions.", "Includes citation and sentiment tracking to verify source attribution and tone." ], "weaknesses": [ "Launched in 2024, so a shorter track record than incumbents", "No traditional social media monitoring" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$100/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Teams that need to track AI visibility over time, not just generate schema.", "differentiator": "Eight-engine coverage with prompt-level reporting, citations, and sentiment delivers the ongoing AI visibility monitoring that AEO Tool's schema generator cannot provide.", "evidenceClaim": "Trakkr earns the top spot because it combines the broadest platform coverage with prompt-level reporting, citation tracking, and sentiment, proving over time whether schema work moved your AI mentions." }, { "rank": 2, "tool": { "id": "agenxus", "name": "Agenxus AEO Tools", "domain": "agenxus.com/tools", "tagline": "Purpose-built AEO tools", "category": "free-tools" }, "summary": "If you like the free, no-login model of AEO Tool but want it to go a step deeper, Agenxus is the closest match. Its AEO Audit looks at entity clarity and content structure rather than just spitting out schema, so the output reads more like a list of things to fix than a single snippet. It's still a one-time audit — run it, act on it, come back later and run it again — with no tracking between visits. The narrow AEO focus is the upside here: the suggestions are about how AI reads your page, not general SEO hygiene.", "strengths": [ "Free, and built specifically for answer-engine optimisation", "AEO Audit analyses entity clarity and content structure", "Output is a list of fixes, not just a schema snippet", "Stays focused on AI search rather than generic SEO" ], "weaknesses": [ "No ongoing monitoring — every run is a fresh snapshot", "A one-time audit can't show whether your changes worked" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$0", "model": "free", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "AEO practitioners who want a deeper free audit than a plain schema generator", "differentiator": "Audits how AI reads your content, not just whether the markup is valid — and keeps it free.", "evidenceClaim": "Second as the strongest free upgrade from AEO Tool; held off the top because it audits once and never tracks the result." }, { "rank": 3, "tool": { "id": "aeotoolshub", "name": "AEO Tools Hub", "domain": "answerengineoptimizationservices.com/tools", "tagline": "Free AEO tool collection", "category": "free-tools" }, "summary": "AEO Tools Hub is less one tool than a drawer of them — an AI Visibility Checker, an AEO Audit Analyzer, a Schema Validator, and the usual markup builders, all free. If you're auditing a site end to end and want a few different lenses on it, the breadth earns its place. It doubles as a decent way to learn the principles as you go, since the tools explain what they're checking. The same caveat applies as the other free options: these are spot checks. Nothing here keeps a history or watches your visibility once you close the tab.", "strengths": [ "The widest set of free AEO utilities in one place", "AI Visibility Checker gives a basic platform read", "Schema Validator catches markup mistakes", "Works as a teaching aid for AEO fundamentals" ], "weaknesses": [ "No history or trend tracking — every check is a snapshot", "Spot checks only, so no real planning signal over time" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$0", "model": "free", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "Teams running a thorough one-off AEO audit who want several free lenses", "differentiator": "The broadest free toolkit here — many small checks in one place, no subscription.", "evidenceClaim": "Third for breadth of free utilities; ranked behind Agenxus because the individual checks are shallower and, like the rest, never track over time." }, { "rank": 4, "tool": { "id": "athenahq", "name": "AthenaHQ", "domain": "athenahq.ai", "tagline": "Action-oriented GEO platform", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Of the paid options here, Athena earns its place by being action-led rather than just another monitor. It covers five engines and pairs alerts with specific GEO fixes, so instead of another chart you get a to-do list — the natural next move once you've outgrown a free generator and want someone to tell you what to change. Pricing is credit-based, which makes a steady monthly budget harder to pin down, and it skips sentiment and citation tracking. If your priority is concrete next steps rather than breadth of data, that trade often works.", "strengths": [ "Recommendations are specific and action-led, not just alerts", "Covers five major engines", "Built around a clear GEO optimisation workflow", "Suits teams that want next steps, not more dashboards" ], "weaknesses": [ "Credit pricing is hard to budget for steady monthly use", "No sentiment or citation tracking", "Still maturing as a platform" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "Credit-based", "model": "credits", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Teams that want a clear list of fixes after they outgrow free utilities", "differentiator": "Turns visibility data into a specific optimisation workflow instead of leaving you a dashboard.", "evidenceClaim": "Fourth as the most action-first paid option; held back by unpredictable credit pricing and gaps in sentiment and citations." }, { "rank": 5, "tool": { "id": "otterly", "name": "Otterly.AI", "domain": "otterly.ai", "tagline": "AI visibility for SEO teams", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Otterly Lite is $29 month-to-month or a $25 monthly equivalent billed annually. It includes 15 prompts across four base engines and a 7-day no-card trial; Claude, Google AI Mode, and Gemini are paid add-ons.", "strengths": [ "Lowest paid entry for ongoing monitoring at $25/mo", "Semrush technology partnership, familiar to SEO teams", "Simple enough to adopt without a ramp-up", "Slots into existing SEO routines" ], "weaknesses": [ "Tracks three engines, missing some majors", "No sentiment analysis or citation tracking" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$25/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Small SEO teams adding their first ongoing AI signal on a tight budget", "differentiator": "The cheapest paid step from a free generator to real ongoing tracking, in a familiar SEO-tool shape.", "evidenceClaim": "Fifth as the lowest-cost paid monitor; basic by design, with three-engine coverage and no sentiment or citations." }, { "rank": 6, "tool": { "id": "atomicagi", "name": "Atomic AGI", "domain": "atomicagi.com", "tagline": "Multi-engine AI tracking", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Atomic AGI puts AI visibility next to classic SERP tracking, so you can see how an AI answer compares with your organic ranking on the same query. At $49 a month it fits an SEO team that wants both views in one place rather than two subscriptions, and the automated SEO audits round it out. The trade is AI reach: it watches two engines, which is the lighter end of this list on AI specifically. As a way to fold a basic AI signal into an existing SEO routine, the price and the combined view make sense.", "strengths": [ "AI visibility and traditional SERP tracking in one tool", "Automated SEO audits included", "Reporting across both search channels", "Reasonable value at $49/mo for the combination" ], "weaknesses": [ "Tracks only two AI engines", "More to learn than the single-purpose monitors" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$49/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "SEO teams that want AI answers and classic rankings side by side", "differentiator": "One subscription covering both AI answers and traditional search, with audits on top.", "evidenceClaim": "Sixth as good value for combined AI-and-SEO tracking; limited on AI specifically by two-engine coverage." }, { "rank": 7, "tool": { "id": "profound", "name": "Profound", "domain": "tryprofound.com", "tagline": "AI answer engine intelligence", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "At the opposite end of the spectrum from a free schema tool sits Profound: an enterprise platform built for large query volumes and deep analysis. Its crawler-interaction monitoring and Conversation Explorer go well past anything a utility offers — you can see how assistants actually talk about your brand. The price reflects that, starting at $99/month billed yearly with no free tier, which puts it out of reach for most teams happy with AEO Tool today. The depth is real, but for a buyer who just wants clear optimisation guidance it can read as more data than decision.", "strengths": [ "Built for large AI query volumes and deep analysis", "Crawler-interaction monitoring most tools don't offer", "Conversation Explorer shows how assistants discuss your brand", "Enterprise-grade analytics and reporting" ], "weaknesses": [ "$99/month billed yearly entry is out of reach for most small and mid-sized teams", "The data depth can outrun a buyer who wants a simple answer" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$99/month billed yearly", "model": "enterprise", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Large enterprises that want deep AI intelligence and have the budget for it", "differentiator": "Crawler-level and conversation-level analysis aimed at enterprise teams, at an enterprise price.", "evidenceClaim": "Seventh because the depth is genuine, but the $1,188 annual Starter commitment makes it a poor fit for many teams leaving a free tool." }, { "rank": 8, "tool": { "id": "scrunch", "name": "Scrunch AI", "domain": "scrunch.com", "tagline": "AI search visibility platform", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Scrunch's distinctive feature is hallucination detection — it flags when an engine states something false about your brand, which none of the free tools here come near. Coverage spans the major engines, the interface is clean, and there's a GA4 integration for tying visibility back to traffic. The catch is the gap in scale: it starts at $250 a month, a long way from a free utility, and a few of the more advanced pieces are still filling in. For a mid-market team that treats accuracy as the priority, that price buys a capability the cheaper options don't have.", "strengths": [ "Broad engine coverage across the majors", "Hallucination detection — flags false AI claims about your brand", "Clean interface with a GA4 integration", "An established base of brands on the platform" ], "weaknesses": [ "$250/mo entry is a big jump from free utilities", "Some of the more advanced features are still maturing" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$250/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Mid-market teams that treat brand accuracy in AI answers as the priority", "differentiator": "Catches false AI claims about your brand — a job the other tools on this list don't really do.", "evidenceClaim": "Eighth on a genuinely rare capability; ranked here because the $250 floor is hard to justify straight off a free tool unless accuracy is the reason." }, { "rank": 9, "tool": { "id": "peec", "name": "Peec AI", "domain": "peec.ai", "tagline": "AI search visibility for agencies", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Peec brand Starter is $95 month-to-month with 50 prompts, three selected engines from six supported surfaces, and unlimited users. Its Try for free CTA has no published duration; API and SSO are Enterprise features.", "strengths": [ "Pitch Workspaces built for client presentations", "Reports you can hand a client without editing", "Light optimisation suggestions included", "Quick to onboard" ], "weaknesses": [ "Baseline tracks three engines", "Competitive analysis is shallow next to enterprise tools" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$99/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Agencies that need client-ready AI visibility reports more than deep analysis", "differentiator": "Pitch Workspaces turn the data into something you can put straight in front of a client.", "evidenceClaim": "Ninth as the cleanest agency-reporting option here; capped by three-engine coverage and light competitive depth." }, { "rank": 10, "tool": { "id": "hypermind", "name": "HyperMind", "domain": "hypermindai.tech", "tagline": "Budget AI visibility tracking", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "HyperMind is a $29-a-month way to dip into ongoing monitoring once a free generator stops being enough. It includes prompt-level analytics, which is more than the price suggests, so you can at least see which queries trigger a mention. What you give up is breadth and history — limited engine coverage, a thin feature set, and not much to lean on long term. Think of it as a cheap test of whether AI visibility is worth paying attention to, rather than the tool you settle on once it is.", "strengths": [ "Low paid entry at $29/mo", "Prompt-level analytics despite the price", "Simple enough for a first paid try", "Quick to set up" ], "weaknesses": [ "Limited engine coverage", "Thinner feature set than the fuller platforms" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$29/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Startups testing whether AI visibility is worth paying for at all", "differentiator": "A low paid step up from free utilities that still gives you a prompt-level view.", "evidenceClaim": "Tenth as a cheap way to test the idea; too thin on coverage and history to rely on past that, and Trakkr covers far more engines once you're ready to commit." } ], "quickCompare": { "rows": [ { "toolId": "trakkr", "toolName": "Trakkr", "startingPrice": "$100/mo", "bestFor": "Broadest AI visibility tracking (8 engines)", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "agenxus", "toolName": "Agenxus AEO Tools", "startingPrice": "$0", "bestFor": "Advanced free AEO utilities", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "free-tools" }, { "toolId": "aeotoolshub", "toolName": "AEO Tools Hub", "startingPrice": "$0", "bestFor": "Comprehensive free tool collection", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "free-tools" }, { "toolId": "athenahq", "toolName": "AthenaHQ", "startingPrice": "Credit-based", "bestFor": "Action-oriented GEO workflows", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "otterly", "toolName": "Otterly.AI", "startingPrice": "$25/mo", "bestFor": "Budget-friendly AI visibility", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "atomicagi", "toolName": "Atomic AGI", "startingPrice": "$49/mo", "bestFor": "Combined AI and SEO tracking", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "profound", "toolName": "Profound", "startingPrice": "$99/month billed yearly", "bestFor": "Enterprise AI intelligence", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "scrunch", "toolName": "Scrunch AI", "startingPrice": "$250/mo", "bestFor": "Comprehensive AI monitoring", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "peec", "toolName": "Peec AI", "startingPrice": "$99/mo", "bestFor": "Agency client reporting", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "hypermind", "toolName": "HyperMind", "startingPrice": "$29/mo", "bestFor": "Budget AI visibility testing", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" } ] }, "trakkrSection": { "headline": "Why Trakkr is the strongest AEO Tool alternative for AI visibility", "body": "AEO Tool handles the schema build step well and remains the best free option for that specific task. But schema is only half the job. If you need to know whether that schema actually changes how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI engines mention your brand, Trakkr fills the gap. It tracks across eight platforms, reports at the prompt level, and surfaces citations and sentiment over time. For teams that have outgrown a one-off generator and want to prove the ROI of their structured data, Trakkr is the natural next step. Use AEO Tool for the markup and Trakkr to watch the results.", "relevance": "direct", "callToAction": "Start the 14-day trial" }, "faqs": [ { "question": "What's the cheapest AEO Tool alternative?", "answer": "Otterly Lite is $29 month-to-month or a $25 monthly equivalent billed annually. It includes 15 prompts across four base engines and a 7-day no-card trial; Claude, Google AI Mode, and Gemini are paid add-ons." }, { "question": "Which AEO Tool alternative is best for ongoing monitoring?", "answer": "Trakkr is built for ongoing monitoring with prompt-level tracking, citations, sentiment, and history. Otterly.AI and others also offer recurring checks, but Trakkr covers the most platforms (eight engines)." }, { "question": "Can I use AEO Tool and a monitoring tool together?", "answer": "Yes. AEO Tool is ideal for generating schema, while a monitoring tool like Trakkr tracks whether that schema influences AI responses. They complement each other well." }, { "question": "Do I need a paid tool if AEO Tool covers my basics?", "answer": "If you just need schema, no. But if you want to see whether your schema impacts AI mentions, a tracking tool like Trakkr adds that insight, with prompt-level reporting across eight engines and a 14-day trial to test it." }, { "question": "Which alternative covers the most AI engines?", "answer": "Trakkr tracks eight engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, and Grok. No other alternative in this list matches that coverage." }, { "question": "What's the best AEO Tool alternative for agencies?", "answer": "Peec AI offers client-ready reports starting at $95/mo and specializes in agency reporting. Trakkr also works across multiple clients and covers more engines, so it suits agencies that want broader tracking depth alongside reporting." } ], "lastVerified": "2026-06-14", "selectionCriteria": [ "Fit against the specific jobs teams hire AEO Tool for, not raw feature counts.", "Pricing clarity: public numbers, free tiers, trial access, and realistic budgets.", "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, reporting, and workflows.", "Strength of public evidence: product docs, reviews, and fact-checked data.", "Ability to deliver recurring reports and stakeholder-ready output, not just one-off checks." ], "whyTeamsLeave": [ { "title": "Someone asks \"did it work?\" and you can't answer", "description": "You shipped the schema a month ago. A manager wants to know if it moved anything. With a one-off generator there's no before-and-after to point at, and that question is usually what pushes a team to a tool that tracks." }, { "title": "A competitor starts showing up where you don't", "description": "You notice ChatGPT recommending a rival by name on a query you should own. A markup utility can't explain why, so you go looking for something that monitors the answers, not just the page." }, { "title": "AEO becomes a reporting line, not a one-time task", "description": "Once AI visibility has to appear in a monthly report or a client update, a tool that only runs ad-hoc checks stops being enough. You need history and something you can export." } ], "whoShouldStay": [ { "title": "Schema is genuinely all you need right now", "description": "If your job this quarter is to ship valid FAQ markup and move on, AEO Tool does that for free. Paying for monitoring you won't look at is the wrong trade until the question changes." }, { "title": "You're not ready to track yet", "description": "Early on, the honest move is to fix the obvious gaps before you measure them. If you haven't done the basic optimisation work, a free generator plus a few weeks of effort beats a monitoring subscription with nothing to show it." }, { "title": "Budget is zero and has to stay there", "description": "If there's no spend available at all, stay free, and note that two other tools on this list (Agenxus and AEO Tools Hub) are also free. When you do have budget, Trakkr adds ongoing tracking that the one-off utilities can't." } ], "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit.", "evaluationChecklist": [ "Confirmed AEO Tool's category, pricing, and positioning before ranking alternatives.", "Ranked tools on buyer fit rather than feature count.", "Kept source coverage and notes visible for each alternative.", "Separated reasons to leave AEO Tool from reasons to stay.", "Gave each tool a plain-English justification for its rank.", "Verified pricing and platform coverage through product pages and documentation." ], "sources": [ { "label": "AEO Tool official website", "url": "https://aeotool.com", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Trakkr official website", "url": "https://trakkr.ai", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Agenxus AEO Tools official website", "url": "https://agenxus.com/tools", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "AEO Tools Hub official website", "url": "https://answerengineoptimizationservices.com/tools", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "AthenaHQ official website", "url": "https://athenahq.ai", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Otterly.AI official website", "url": "https://otterly.ai", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" } ] }