{
  "meta": {
    "slug": "profound-alternatives",
    "title": "Profound Alternatives: Cheaper AI Visibility Tools",
    "description": "Profound publishes Starter at a $99 monthly equivalent and Growth at a $399 monthly equivalent, both billed annually. Growth has a 7-day trial; Enterprise is a custom quote.",
    "publishedDate": "2025-12-16",
    "lastUpdated": "2026-06-14",
    "targetToolId": "profound",
    "alternativesCount": 10
  },
  "author": {
    "name": "Mack Grenfell",
    "title": "AI Search Researcher",
    "url": "https://trakkr.ai/about",
    "twitter": "mackgrenfell",
    "linkedin": "mackgrenfell"
  },
  "targetTool": {
    "id": "profound",
    "name": "Profound",
    "domain": "tryprofound.com",
    "tagline": "AI answer engine intelligence",
    "category": "ai-visibility",
    "pricing": {
      "startingPrice": "$99/mo billed yearly",
      "model": "enterprise",
      "hasFreeTier": false,
      "paidStartsAt": "$99/mo billed yearly",
      "trialDays": 7
    }
  },
  "content": {
    "intro": "Profound Starter covers one engine; Growth covers three, while broader Enterprise coverage requires a custom quote.",
    "whyAlternatives": {
      "headline": "Why look for a Profound alternative?",
      "reasons": [
        {
          "title": "The price floor",
          "description": "Starter is a $99 monthly equivalent with a $1,188 annual commitment. Growth is a $399 monthly equivalent with a $4,788 annual commitment and a 7-day trial. Neither public plan is month-to-month."
        },
        {
          "title": "More tool than the job needs",
          "description": "Profound's depth is aimed at large organisations. If the question you actually have is \"where do we stand in AI answers, and what do we fix first?\", a lot of that depth reads as noise rather than a clear next step."
        },
        {
          "title": "The best coverage is gated",
          "description": "Engine coverage and the more useful panels scale with the plan. For enterprise money you'd expect everything included; in practice the broadest coverage sits on the priciest tier."
        },
        {
          "title": "Annual billing on public plans",
          "description": "Starter and Growth have direct signup paths, but both are billed annually. Growth has a 7-day trial; Enterprise remains a custom quote."
        }
      ]
    },
    "methodology": "Each tool was assessed on engine coverage, how accessible the pricing is, feature depth against the jobs teams hire Profound for, and the quality of public evidence — product pages, docs, and structured facts. Prices and plan details were checked against public pricing pages in June 2026; they move often, so reconfirm before you buy.",
    "selectionCriteria": [
      "Fit against the jobs teams usually hire Profound to do, not raw feature count.",
      "How clear the pricing is: public numbers, trial access, free tier, and the budget you would realistically commit.",
      "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, social listening, reporting, and action workflows where relevant.",
      "Strength of public evidence: product pages, documentation, reviews, and structured facts.",
      "Whether it holds up for recurring reporting and stakeholder-ready output, not just a one-off look."
    ],
    "whyTeamsLeave": [
      {
        "title": "A renewal lands and the number jumps",
        "description": "Enterprise contracts rarely get cheaper at renewal. That's often the moment a team checks whether it's paying for depth it never uses."
      },
      {
        "title": "The reports don't turn into actions",
        "description": "Rich dashboards are easy to admire and hard to act on. Teams leave when the data never resolves into \"do this next\"."
      },
      {
        "title": "A smaller team inherits the tool",
        "description": "When AI visibility moves from a central function to a lean marketing team, enterprise tooling and annual commitments stop fitting how they work."
      }
    ],
    "whoShouldStay": [
      {
        "title": "You're already getting value from the depth",
        "description": "If your team uses Profound's demand and prompt-volume research and trusts the data, the breadth is the point. Switching to save money would cost you the thing you actually rely on."
      },
      {
        "title": "Enterprise coverage is a hard requirement",
        "description": "If you need many engines, custom reporting, and an account team as table stakes, that's where Profound is strongest and where cheaper tools thin out fast."
      },
      {
        "title": "Procurement is already settled",
        "description": "Contracts signed, integrations live, stakeholders trained — if the missing pieces aren't urgent, the cost of moving can outweigh the saving."
      }
    ],
    "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit."
  },
  "alternatives": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "tool": {
        "id": "trakkr",
        "name": "Trakkr",
        "domain": "trakkr.ai",
        "tagline": "AI brand visibility tracking",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Trakkr is the natural first stop for anyone leaving Profound over price or flexibility. It tracks eight AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, and Grok. It reports at the prompt level, showing exactly which questions trigger a mention. Citations, sentiment across trust and quality, and competitor share sit in the same dashboard. More important, Trakkr is the only tool in this guide with a 14-day free trial. You can start monitoring your brand's AI visibility without a sales call or a contract. For teams that need broad coverage and want to avoid the $99/month billed yearly barrier, Trakkr fits the exact gap Profound leaves.",
      "strengths": [
        "14-day free trial, the only one on this list.",
        "Tracks eight AI engines, including Gemini and Meta AI.",
        "Prompt level view showing which questions trigger mentions.",
        "Built only for AI visibility, not bolted onto an older SEO product."
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Launched in 2024, so a shorter track record than incumbents",
        "No traditional social listening",
        "Fewer third-party integrations than enterprise suites"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$100/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Teams that want broad AI visibility coverage with a 14-day trial and no sales call.",
      "differentiator": "A 14-day free trial plus the widest engine coverage here fills the gap most teams leave Profound to fill.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Trakkr earns the number one spot because it offers the broadest coverage (eight engines) at the lowest commitment, with a 14-day free trial in this comparison."
    },
    {
      "rank": 2,
      "tool": {
        "id": "scrunch",
        "name": "Scrunch AI",
        "domain": "scrunch.com",
        "tagline": "AI search visibility platform",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Scrunch's stand-out is hallucination detection — it flags when an engine says something false about your brand, which is the one job on this list Profound doesn't really do. It covers the major engines, the interface is clean, and there are agency features for running several clients at once. Two caveats: it starts at $250 a month with no free tier, and it's built to tell you what's happening rather than what to change. If brand-accuracy monitoring is the reason you're looking, it earns the second spot.",
      "strengths": [
        "Hallucination detection — flags false AI claims about your brand",
        "Clean interface and solid coverage of the major engines",
        "Agency tooling for managing multiple clients",
        "Established base of brands on the platform"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Starts at $250/mo with no free tier",
        "Leans toward monitoring rather than telling you what to fix",
        "Some features still maturing"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$250/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Mid-market teams and agencies that need accuracy monitoring with hallucination alerts",
      "differentiator": "Catches false AI claims about your brand — a capability none of the others on this list match.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Second because hallucination detection is real and rare; held off the top by a $250 floor and a monitoring-only scope."
    },
    {
      "rank": 3,
      "tool": {
        "id": "ziptie",
        "name": "ZipTie.dev",
        "domain": "ziptie.dev",
        "tagline": "Enterprise AI search monitoring",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "ZipTie targets enterprise teams that want custom dashboards and citation attribution — tracking which sources an engine leans on when it answers about you. It covers five engines and starts at $69 a month, which is low for the enterprise framing. It's a newer entrant, so there's less public detail and a narrower feature set than the established names. If your real question is \"where are these answers coming from?\", the attribution angle is worth a look.",
      "strengths": [
        "Citation attribution shows which sources feed AI answers about you",
        "Customisable dashboards for enterprise reporting",
        "Alerts paired with optimisation guidance",
        "Covers five major engines"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Limited public information as a newer entrant",
        "Enterprise framing fits larger teams better",
        "Narrower feature set than established competitors"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$69/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Enterprise teams that want custom dashboards and citation-level attribution",
      "differentiator": "Citation attribution — traces the sources behind AI answers about your brand.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Third on a strong, specific angle (attribution) at a fair price; held back by thin public detail and a narrow feature set."
    },
    {
      "rank": 4,
      "tool": {
        "id": "peec",
        "name": "Peec AI",
        "domain": "peec.ai",
        "tagline": "AI search visibility for agencies",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Peec brand Starter is $95 month-to-month with 50 prompts, three selected engines from six supported surfaces, and unlimited users. Its Try for free CTA has no published duration; API and SSO are Enterprise features.",
      "strengths": [
        "Pitch Workspaces built for client presentations",
        "Quick onboarding and an interface non-specialists can read",
        "Reasonable value at $99/mo for multi-client work",
        "Simple, suggestion-led optimisation prompts"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Baseline plan tracks three engines, missing Claude and Gemini",
        "Recommendations are shallower than enterprise tools",
        "No API on the entry plan"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$99/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Agencies that need client-ready AI visibility reports more than deep analysis",
      "differentiator": "Pitch Workspaces turn the data into something you can hand a client without editing.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Fourth as the cleanest agency-reporting option; capped by three-engine baseline coverage and light analysis depth."
    },
    {
      "rank": 5,
      "tool": {
        "id": "yextscout",
        "name": "Yext Scout",
        "domain": "yext.com/scout",
        "tagline": "AI search benchmarking",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Scout folds AI visibility into Yext's wider platform, with cross-engine benchmarking and share-of-voice tracking. If you already run Yext for structured data, it slots in without new tooling, and you get an established public company behind it. If you don't, it's a harder sell: pricing is sales-only, and most of the value assumes you're already inside the Yext ecosystem. It's a fit for existing Yext customers more than a standalone choice.",
      "strengths": [
        "Backed by an established public company",
        "Cross-engine benchmarking with share-of-voice tracking",
        "Slots into existing Yext structured-data workflows",
        "Enterprise-grade reporting"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Most of the value assumes you already use Yext",
        "Pricing is sales-only, with no public number",
        "A newer product with a short track record"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "Contact sales",
        "model": "enterprise",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Teams already on Yext that want AI visibility inside the same platform",
      "differentiator": "Tight integration with Yext's structured-data platform for teams already invested in it.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Fifth as a strong add-on for existing Yext customers; less compelling on its own given sales-only pricing and ecosystem lock-in."
    },
    {
      "rank": 6,
      "tool": {
        "id": "athenahq",
        "name": "AthenaHQ",
        "domain": "athenahq.ai",
        "tagline": "Action-oriented GEO platform",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Athena leans on action rather than monitoring. It covers five engines and pairs alerts with specific GEO recommendations, so it suits a team that would rather be told what to fix than handed another chart. The pricing is credit-based, which makes ongoing budgets harder to predict, and it skips sentiment and citation tracking. If your priority is a clear to-do list out of the data, that's where it's strongest.",
      "strengths": [
        "Recommendations are specific and action-led, not just alerts",
        "Covers five major engines",
        "Built around a clear GEO optimisation workflow",
        "Suited to teams that want next steps, not just numbers"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Credit-based pricing is hard to budget for ongoing use",
        "No sentiment or citation tracking",
        "Still maturing as a platform"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "Credit-based",
        "model": "credits",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "GEO-focused teams that want a clear list of fixes, not just monitoring",
      "differentiator": "Turns visibility data into a specific optimisation workflow rather than a dashboard.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Sixth for its action-first approach; held back by unpredictable credit pricing and gaps in sentiment and citation tracking."
    },
    {
      "rank": 7,
      "tool": {
        "id": "atomicagi",
        "name": "Atomic AGI",
        "domain": "atomicagi.com",
        "tagline": "Multi-engine AI tracking",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Atomic AGI pairs AI visibility with classic SERP tracking and automated SEO audits, at $49 a month. That combination fits an SEO team that wants both views in one place rather than two subscriptions. The trade is reach: it watches two AI engines, with no sentiment or citation tracking, so it's the lighter option on AI specifically. As a way to add a basic AI signal to an existing SEO routine, the price is right.",
      "strengths": [
        "AI visibility and traditional SERP tracking in one tool",
        "Automated SEO audits included",
        "Affordable at $49/mo",
        "Reporting across both search channels"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Tracks only two AI engines",
        "No sentiment or citation tracking",
        "Less specialised than dedicated AI tools"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$49/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "SEO teams that want a basic AI signal alongside their existing SERP tracking",
      "differentiator": "One subscription covering both AI answers and classic search.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Seventh as a good-value combined tool for SEO teams; limited on AI specifically by two-engine coverage and missing sentiment and citations."
    },
    {
      "rank": 8,
      "tool": {
        "id": "hypermind",
        "name": "HyperMind",
        "domain": "hypermindai.tech",
        "tagline": "Budget AI visibility tracking",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "At $29 a month, HyperMind comes in as the cheapest paid entry here, with prompt-level analytics and a setup simple enough for a first look. You give up breadth and depth for that price — limited engine coverage, no sentiment or citation tracking, and little history to lean on. Think of it as a way to test whether AI visibility matters for you, rather than something to run on long term.",
      "strengths": [
        "Lowest paid price on the list at $29/mo",
        "Prompt-level analytics despite the price",
        "Beginner-friendly interface",
        "Fast to set up"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Limited engine coverage and feature set",
        "No sentiment, citation tracking, or real history",
        "Thin support and documentation"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$29/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Small teams testing whether AI visibility is worth tracking at all",
      "differentiator": "The lowest paid entry point that still gives you a prompt-level view.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Eighth as a cheap way to test the idea; too thin on coverage, history, and depth to rely on past that."
    },
    {
      "rank": 9,
      "tool": {
        "id": "otterly",
        "name": "Otterly.AI",
        "domain": "otterly.ai",
        "tagline": "AI visibility for SEO teams",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "Otterly Lite is $29 month-to-month or a $25 monthly equivalent billed annually. It includes 15 prompts across four base engines and a 7-day no-card trial; Claude, Google AI Mode, and Gemini are paid add-ons.",
      "strengths": [
        "Low price at $25/mo with a Semrush technology partnership",
        "Comfortable for teams already in SEO tools",
        "Simple, fast to adopt",
        "Reasonable starting point for traditional search teams"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Tracks three engines, missing some majors",
        "No sentiment or citation tracking",
        "No API and limited depth"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$25/mo",
        "model": "subscription",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Small SEO teams adding a first AI signal to existing workflows",
      "differentiator": "Familiar to Semrush users and easy to slot into an existing SEO routine.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Ninth as a low-friction first step for SEO teams; basic by design, with three-engine coverage and no sentiment or citations."
    },
    {
      "rank": 10,
      "tool": {
        "id": "rankscale",
        "name": "RankScale",
        "domain": "rankscale.ai",
        "tagline": "AI search simulation lab",
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      "summary": "RankScale is a testing lab, not a monitor. For about $20 a month in credits you can run the same prompt across several models at once and compare the answers side by side — handy before a launch or for QA. It's less suited to daily tracking: there's no real-time alerting, and it expects a little more technical comfort than the others. Useful as a companion to a monitoring tool rather than a replacement for one.",
      "strengths": [
        "Run one prompt across several models at once",
        "Credit-based, with no monthly lock-in",
        "Regional analysis for geographic testing",
        "Side-by-side model comparison"
      ],
      "weaknesses": [
        "Built for testing, not ongoing monitoring",
        "Expects more technical comfort",
        "No real-time alerts"
      ],
      "pricing": {
        "startingPrice": "$20/mo",
        "model": "credits",
        "hasFreeTier": false
      },
      "bestFor": "Technical teams testing AI answers before a launch or running QA",
      "differentiator": "A simulation lab for comparing models on the same prompt — a testing tool, not a tracker.",
      "evidenceClaim": "Tenth because it solves a different problem: pre-launch testing rather than ongoing monitoring, with no alerting."
    }
  ],
  "quickCompare": {
    "rows": [
      {
        "toolId": "trakkr",
        "toolName": "Trakkr",
        "startingPrice": "$100/mo",
        "bestFor": "Accessible AI visibility tracking",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "scrunch",
        "toolName": "Scrunch AI",
        "startingPrice": "$250/mo",
        "bestFor": "Hallucination detection",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "ziptie",
        "toolName": "ZipTie.dev",
        "startingPrice": "$69/mo",
        "bestFor": "Enterprise dashboards",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "peec",
        "toolName": "Peec AI",
        "startingPrice": "$99/mo",
        "bestFor": "Agency reporting",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "yextscout",
        "toolName": "Yext Scout",
        "startingPrice": "Contact sales",
        "bestFor": "Yext ecosystem integration",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "athenahq",
        "toolName": "AthenaHQ",
        "startingPrice": "Credit-based",
        "bestFor": "Action-oriented optimization",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "atomicagi",
        "toolName": "Atomic AGI",
        "startingPrice": "$49/mo",
        "bestFor": "AI + traditional SEO",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "hypermind",
        "toolName": "HyperMind",
        "startingPrice": "$29/mo",
        "bestFor": "Budget testing",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "otterly",
        "toolName": "Otterly.AI",
        "startingPrice": "$25/mo",
        "bestFor": "SEO teams",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      },
      {
        "toolId": "rankscale",
        "toolName": "RankScale",
        "startingPrice": "$20/mo",
        "bestFor": "Testing and QA",
        "hasFreeTier": false,
        "category": "ai-visibility"
      }
    ]
  },
  "trakkrSection": {
    "headline": "Why Trakkr tops this list for AI visibility",
    "body": "For teams focused solely on AI visibility, Trakkr offers the strongest combination of breadth and accessibility. Its 14-day free trial removes the risk of commitment, while prompt level and citation tracking deliver the detail most buyers need to act. Profound still leads in demand research depth and enterprise integrations, but those come at a cost. When the job is monitoring how AI assistants describe your brand across the widest range of engines, Trakkr is the clear choice.",
    "relevance": "direct",
    "callToAction": "Start the 14-day trial"
  },
  "faqs": [
    {
      "question": "What is the best overall alternative to Profound?",
      "answer": "Trakkr is the best overall alternative for teams that want broad AI platform coverage and a 14-day free trial. It tracks eight engines and provides prompt level and citation detail during the 14-day trial."
    },
    {
      "question": "Which Profound alternative is cheapest or free?",
      "answer": "Trakkr is an alternative with a 14-day free trial. For paid options, Atomic AGI starts at $49 per month and HyperMind at $29 per month, but neither offers monitoring during the 14-day trial."
    },
    {
      "question": "Which alternative covers the most AI platforms?",
      "answer": "Trakkr covers the most AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, and Grok. That is eight engines, the widest range in this guide."
    },
    {
      "question": "Which alternative is best for agencies?",
      "answer": "Peec AI is built for agencies needing client-ready reports at $95 per month. Trakkr also fits agencies that want a 14-day trial and broad engine coverage for multiple clients."
    },
    {
      "question": "Can I run Profound and an alternative side by side?",
      "answer": "Yes. Many teams run Profound alongside a lower cost tool like Trakkr or ZipTie.dev to compare coverage or cover different use cases without raising budget."
    },
    {
      "question": "Which alternative gives the best optimisation guidance?",
      "answer": "AthenaHQ offers a clear list of fixes and is credit based. Trakkr focuses on monitoring and citation insight rather than prescriptive SEO advice."
    }
  ],
  "lastVerified": "2026-06-14",
  "selectionCriteria": [
    "Fit against the jobs teams usually hire Profound to do, not raw feature count.",
    "How clear the pricing is: public numbers, trial access, free tier, and the budget you would realistically commit.",
    "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, social listening, reporting, and action workflows where relevant.",
    "Strength of public evidence: product pages, documentation, reviews, and structured facts.",
    "Whether it holds up for recurring reporting and stakeholder-ready output, not just a one-off look."
  ],
  "whyTeamsLeave": [
    {
      "title": "A renewal lands and the number jumps",
      "description": "Enterprise contracts rarely get cheaper at renewal. That's often the moment a team checks whether it's paying for depth it never uses."
    },
    {
      "title": "The reports don't turn into actions",
      "description": "Rich dashboards are easy to admire and hard to act on. Teams leave when the data never resolves into \"do this next\"."
    },
    {
      "title": "A smaller team inherits the tool",
      "description": "When AI visibility moves from a central function to a lean marketing team, enterprise tooling and annual commitments stop fitting how they work."
    }
  ],
  "whoShouldStay": [
    {
      "title": "You're already getting value from the depth",
      "description": "If your team uses Profound's demand and prompt-volume research and trusts the data, the breadth is the point. Switching to save money would cost you the thing you actually rely on."
    },
    {
      "title": "Enterprise coverage is a hard requirement",
      "description": "If you need many engines, custom reporting, and an account team as table stakes, that's where Profound is strongest and where cheaper tools thin out fast."
    },
    {
      "title": "Procurement is already settled",
      "description": "Contracts signed, integrations live, stakeholders trained — if the missing pieces aren't urgent, the cost of moving can outweigh the saving."
    }
  ],
  "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit.",
  "evaluationChecklist": [
    "Confirmed Profound's category, pricing context, and positioning before ranking anything against it.",
    "Ranked on buyer fit, not feature count.",
    "Kept source coverage and notes visible on the page.",
    "Separated reasons to leave from reasons to stay.",
    "Gave each alternative a plain English reason for its rank."
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "label": "Profound official website",
      "url": "https://tryprofound.com",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    },
    {
      "label": "Trakkr official website",
      "url": "https://trakkr.ai",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    },
    {
      "label": "Scrunch AI official website",
      "url": "https://scrunch.com",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    },
    {
      "label": "ZipTie.dev official website",
      "url": "https://ziptie.dev",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    },
    {
      "label": "Peec AI official website",
      "url": "https://peec.ai",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    },
    {
      "label": "Yext Scout official website",
      "url": "https://yext.com/scout",
      "type": "official",
      "lastVerified": "2026-06-13"
    }
  ]
}