{ "meta": { "slug": "surferseo-alternatives", "title": "10 Best Surfer SEO Alternatives (2026)", "description": "Looking for Surfer SEO alternatives? Compare 10 tools for content optimisation and AI visibility. Trakkr tops the list with 8 AI platforms tracked, prompt-level insights, and citation tracking.", "publishedDate": "2025-12-16", "lastUpdated": "2026-06-14", "targetToolId": "surferseo", "alternativesCount": 10 }, "author": { "name": "Mack Grenfell", "title": "AI Search Researcher", "url": "https://trakkr.ai/about", "twitter": "mackgrenfell", "linkedin": "mackgrenfell" }, "targetTool": { "id": "surferseo", "name": "Surfer SEO", "domain": "surferseo.com", "tagline": "Content optimization for SEO", "category": "content-seo", "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$59/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false } }, "content": { "intro": "Surfer SEO is a solid content optimisation tool. Its NLP-driven scoring and keyword clustering work well for on-page SEO. But as AI assistants reshape how brands get found, Surfer's AI visibility piece feels bolted on. This guide compares 10 alternatives, split between better content tools and purpose-built AI monitors. If your focus is AI visibility, the list leads with Trakkr, a tool that tracks eight AI engines and shows exactly which questions surface your brand. If pure content editing is the need, tools like Clearscope or Frase might suit you better. Here is the breakdown.", "whyAlternatives": { "headline": "Why look for a Surfer SEO alternative?", "reasons": [ { "title": "The AI tracking is an add-on", "description": "Surfer's AI visibility coverage is fairly narrow on the baseline plan, and it sits beside the content editor rather than at the centre. If watching AI answers is your main job, a dedicated tool tends to go further, so check current coverage on both before you decide." }, { "title": "It's a content tool first", "description": "Surfer is built to optimise a page. If what you really need is ongoing brand monitoring across AI assistants, you're using a writing product for a watching job." }, { "title": "Alerts are thin", "description": "Surfer isn't built to ping you the moment an AI assistant says something about your brand. For reputation work, that lag matters: you'd hear about a problem later than you'd like." }, { "title": "There's no free tier", "description": "Plans start at $59 a month with nothing free to test first. If budget is tight, or you just want to try before committing, several tools here start cheaper or offer a free plan." }, { "title": "Some pieces are missing", "description": "Sentiment analysis, citation tracking, and prompt-level detail aren't really Surfer's remit. If you want those, the specialised monitors cover them and Surfer mostly doesn't." } ] }, "methodology": "Each tool was weighed on AI-assistant coverage, monitoring depth, pricing, content-optimisation features, and overall value against the jobs teams hire Surfer for. Prices and plan details were checked against public pricing pages in June 2026; they move often, so reconfirm before you buy. Where a competitor's limits couldn't be confirmed from public pages, I've hedged rather than asserted.", "selectionCriteria": [ "Fit against the jobs teams actually hire Surfer for, not raw feature count.", "How clear the pricing is: public numbers, trial access, a free tier, and the budget you would realistically commit.", "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, social listening, reporting, and action workflows where relevant.", "Strength of public evidence: product pages, documentation, reviews, and structured facts.", "Whether it holds up for recurring reporting and stakeholder-ready output, not just a one-off look.", "Real competitor strengths named plainly, not only the gaps that favour one tool." ], "whyTeamsLeave": [ { "title": "AI search became the real job", "description": "Teams often buy Surfer for content scoring and only later realise the question that matters is how ChatGPT and Perplexity describe them. At that point a content tool with a narrow AI add-on stops being enough." }, { "title": "Cheaper optimisation does the same work", "description": "For straight content optimisation, tools like Frase start far below Surfer's $59. When the budget tightens, paying more for a similar editing experience is the first thing questioned." }, { "title": "Missing a brand crisis by a day", "description": "Without real-time alerts, you find out an AI assistant got something wrong about you after the fact. One late catch is usually enough to send a team looking for a tool that pings them." }, { "title": "The stack got too crowded", "description": "Surfer for content, something else for SEO, something else again for AI: teams leave when one tool can cover more of that ground and trim the subscription list." } ], "whoShouldStay": [ { "title": "Writing optimisation is the daily job", "description": "If your team is in Surfer to score and tighten drafts every day and the content engine is doing its job, that's its strength. Swapping to a monitoring tool would cost you the editor you actually use." }, { "title": "The keyword and NLP data is trusted", "description": "If your writers rely on Surfer's term suggestions and clustering and the output ranks, that trust is hard-won. A cheaper tool with weaker NLP isn't a saving if the content gets worse." }, { "title": "AI tracking is a nice-to-have, not the point", "description": "If you mainly want content optimisation and Surfer's lighter AI coverage is enough for an occasional glance, there's little reason to move for a feature you barely use." } ], "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit." }, "alternatives": [ { "rank": 1, "tool": { "id": "trakkr", "name": "Trakkr", "domain": "trakkr.ai", "tagline": "AI brand visibility tracking", "category": "ai-visibility" }, "summary": "Trakkr is the natural first stop when AI visibility is the primary goal. It watches eight AI platforms including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews and Grok. That is the widest coverage on this list. Trakkr reports at the prompt level, showing the exact questions that surface your brand. It splits sentiment across trust and quality, shows the citations behind each answer, and sends alerts when new mentions appear. Pricing is public and flat, with a 14-day trial so you can see the depth before you commit. For teams leaving Surfer SEO to focus on AI monitoring, Trakkr delivers depth that Surfer's add-on cannot match.", "strengths": [ "Tracks 8 AI platforms including Claude, Gemini, and Grok", "Widest AI engine coverage on this list, all in one place", "Prompt level view reveals which questions trigger mentions", "Citation tracking and sentiment analysis across trust and quality" ], "weaknesses": [ "Launched in 2024, so a shorter track record than incumbents", "No traditional social media monitoring", "Fewer integrations than enterprise SEO suites" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$100/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Teams that want to see and improve how AI assistants describe their brand", "differentiator": "Trakkr is built solely for AI visibility, covering eight engines with prompt level detail, citations, and sentiment while Surfer SEO treats AI as a side feature.", "evidenceClaim": "Trakkr ranks first because it offers the broadest AI platform coverage and specificity (prompt level, citations, sentiment) that Surfer SEO's add-on lacks." }, { "rank": 2, "tool": { "id": "clearscope", "name": "Clearscope", "domain": "clearscope.io", "tagline": "Content optimization platform", "category": "content-seo" }, "summary": "If you're leaving Surfer but want to stay in content optimisation, Clearscope is the premium swap. It grades and improves a draft as you write, and the feedback is sharp, with many writers rating the experience above Surfer's, helped by tight Google Docs and WordPress integration. It's started adding AI visibility too, though that piece is still young, so don't buy it for that alone. The catch is price: it starts at $129 a month, well above Surfer's $59. For a content team that wants the best editing experience and will pay for it, it's a clean upgrade.", "strengths": [ "Sharp real-time content grading and suggestions", "Tight Google Docs and WordPress integration", "Editing experience many writers prefer to Surfer's", "Clean interface built for content teams" ], "weaknesses": [ "Pricier than Surfer, starting at $129/mo", "AI visibility features are newer than the dedicated tools", "AI-assistant coverage is limited" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$129/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Content teams that want the best editing experience and will pay for it", "differentiator": "A more polished content-optimisation experience than Surfer, with stronger integrations.", "evidenceClaim": "Second as the premium content-optimisation pick; held off the top by a $129 floor and AI tracking that's still maturing." }, { "rank": 3, "tool": { "id": "marketmuse", "name": "MarketMuse", "domain": "marketmuse.com", "tagline": "AI content strategy", "category": "content-seo" }, "summary": "MarketMuse works a level up from Surfer. Where Surfer optimises a single page, MarketMuse plans the whole content programme: modelling topics, spotting gaps, and mapping the route to topical authority. There's a free tier to start, and the topic clustering and competitive analysis give you a strategy rather than a per-page score. It does no AI-assistant monitoring at all, so it isn't the tool if that's your goal. As a planning layer that sits above tactical optimisation, though, it complements Surfer more than it replaces it.", "strengths": [ "Content-strategy planning with topic modelling", "Content gap analysis and competitive intelligence", "Free tier for basic content research", "Built around topical authority, not single pages" ], "weaknesses": [ "No AI-assistant tracking of any kind", "Higher-tier pricing isn't shown publicly", "Steeper learning curve than simpler editors" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$0/mo", "model": "freemium", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "Content strategists planning whole programmes and building topical authority", "differentiator": "Strategy and planning above the page level, with a free tier to start.", "evidenceClaim": "Third for strategic content planning, which Surfer doesn't really do; it's no help on AI monitoring, which is why it sits here." }, { "rank": 4, "tool": { "id": "frase", "name": "Frase", "domain": "frase.io", "tagline": "AI content optimization", "category": "content-seo" }, "summary": "Frase makes its case on price. At $14.99 a month it's a quarter of Surfer's cost, and it bundles content research, optimisation, and AI writing assistance into one tidy package. Its strong suit is briefs: it's quick at turning a topic into a structured outline and question-based research you can write from. The NLP analysis isn't as deep as Surfer's, and there's no AI-assistant monitoring, so you're trading some optimisation depth for the lower bill. For a solo creator or a small team watching costs, that trade usually makes sense.", "strengths": [ "Cheapest content tool here at $14.99/mo", "Quick, strong content brief generation", "AI writing assistance built into the workflow", "Fast to set up and easy to use" ], "weaknesses": [ "No AI-assistant tracking", "Less optimisation depth than Surfer or Clearscope", "Narrower scope, focused on creating content" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$14.99/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Solo creators and small teams who want affordable content optimisation", "differentiator": "Most of the core optimisation at a fraction of Surfer's price.", "evidenceClaim": "Fourth as the budget content pick; you give up some NLP depth and any AI monitoring for the lower price." }, { "rank": 5, "tool": { "id": "moz", "name": "Moz", "domain": "moz.com", "tagline": "SEO software and data", "category": "seo" }, "summary": "Moz is a different category from Surfer (broad SEO rather than content optimisation) but it lands here as the approachable option for teams new to search. Its Domain Authority metric is a familiar shorthand, the learning resources are genuinely good, and the interface won't intimidate a beginner. You get solid keyword research, rank tracking, and site audits, plus strong local SEO, at a fair price. What it doesn't do is content optimisation or any AI-assistant monitoring, so it's a foundation tool rather than a Surfer swap. For SEO fundamentals, it's a reasonable starting point.", "strengths": [ "Domain Authority is a widely-recognised shorthand", "Strong learning resources and an approachable interface", "Good local SEO for location-based businesses", "Affordable entry with a 30-day trial" ], "weaknesses": [ "No content optimisation and no AI-assistant tracking", "Smaller link index than Ahrefs or Semrush", "Fewer advanced features than the bigger SEO suites" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$99/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "Small teams and SEO beginners who want an approachable foundation", "differentiator": "The gentlest on-ramp to SEO, strong on learning resources and local search.", "evidenceClaim": "Fifth as the friendliest SEO starting point; it's a different job from Surfer, with no content optimisation or AI tracking." }, { "rank": 6, "tool": { "id": "seranking", "name": "SE Ranking", "domain": "seranking.com", "tagline": "All-in-one SEO software", "category": "seo" }, "summary": "SE Ranking packs a full SEO toolkit into one affordable interface (rank tracking, keyword research, site audits, competitor analysis) and adds AI Overview tracking on top, starting at €109/month for the SEO suite. It's been around since 2013, so the SEO side is mature. The AI piece is where to read the fine print: it tracks Google AI Overviews and not, as far as the public pages show, ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity. For traditional SEO with a glance at Google's AI answers it's good value; for broad AI-assistant coverage it falls short of the dedicated tools.", "strengths": [ "Full SEO toolkit at a competitive $39/mo", "AI Overview tracking built into rank tracking", "Mature platform, running since 2013", "One tool covering several SEO jobs" ], "weaknesses": [ "AI tracking appears limited to Google AI Overviews", "No ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity coverage on public plans", "The AI side feels supplementary to the SEO core" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "SE Visible $99/mo; SEO suite €109/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false, "trialDays": 10 }, "bestFor": "SEO teams that want a full toolkit with a look at Google's AI answers", "differentiator": "Affordable all-in-one SEO with AI Overview tracking included.", "evidenceClaim": "Sixth as strong-value SEO with a Google-AI glance; its AI coverage stops at Overviews, which is why a dedicated monitor beats it there." }, { "rank": 7, "tool": { "id": "jasper", "name": "Jasper", "domain": "jasper.ai", "tagline": "AI content operations", "category": "content-generation" }, "summary": "Strictly, Jasper is a content-generation tool, not an optimisation or monitoring one, so it's only loosely a Surfer alternative. What it does well is produce on-brand content at scale: it holds a consistent brand voice across formats and channels, with team collaboration and marketing integrations aimed at larger orgs. It won't optimise a page against a target keyword and it does no AI-assistant tracking, so a team buying it for those reasons would be disappointed. Pair it with something else for optimisation and monitoring; on its own it writes, it doesn't measure.", "strengths": [ "Strong AI content generation with brand-voice control", "Team features and collaboration aimed at larger orgs", "Wide integrations with marketing and content platforms", "Established product in the content-generation space" ], "weaknesses": [ "No content optimisation and no AI-assistant tracking", "Pricing suits larger teams more than solo users", "A different category from content SEO entirely" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$59/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": false }, "bestFor": "Marketing teams that need on-brand AI content generation at scale", "differentiator": "Generates content well, but lacks the optimisation and monitoring Surfer is built for.", "evidenceClaim": "Seventh because it writes rather than optimises or monitors; useful alongside Surfer, not a replacement for it." }, { "rank": 8, "tool": { "id": "semrush", "name": "Semrush", "domain": "semrush.com", "tagline": "All-in-one marketing toolkit", "category": "seo" }, "summary": "Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit Base covers ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity with 25 prompts. Its published $99 per-domain monthly equivalent is billed annually and is separate from the core SEO suite.", "strengths": [ "Very large keyword database", "Deep competitive intelligence and market research", "AI Overview metrics in position tracking", "Solid content-marketing tools and workflows" ], "weaknesses": [ "No monitoring for ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity", "More tool than a focused use case needs", "Priciest SEO option here at $139/mo" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$139/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "Marketing teams that want the full SEO and content toolkit with a glance at AI", "differentiator": "The broadest marketing toolkit here, but no dedicated AI-assistant monitoring beyond Google.", "evidenceClaim": "Eighth as strong for broad marketing needs; overkill for a focused job, and its AI coverage stops at Google's Overviews." }, { "rank": 9, "tool": { "id": "ahrefs", "name": "Ahrefs", "domain": "ahrefs.com", "tagline": "SEO tools and resources", "category": "seo" }, "summary": "For backlink analysis and SEO research, Ahrefs is about as good as it gets: one of the largest link indexes in the business, a strong content explorer, and data SEO professionals trust. The clean interface and reliable numbers are why it's a staple for link building and organic search work. What it doesn't do is monitor AI assistants (not ChatGPT, not even Google AI Overviews on the SEO side as a tracked answer source), so it's no help if AI visibility is your reason for leaving Surfer. Excellent at traditional SEO, silent on AI search.", "strengths": [ "One of the largest backlink indexes available", "Strong content explorer for research and ideation", "Clean interface with reliable data", "Solid rank tracking and keyword research" ], "weaknesses": [ "No AI-assistant monitoring", "Traditional search focus, nothing on AI answers", "Pricier at $129/mo, with limited free features" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$129/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "SEO professionals focused on link building and organic search", "differentiator": "Top-tier backlink and SEO research, with no AI monitoring at all.", "evidenceClaim": "Ninth because the SEO research is excellent but it does nothing on AI, the opposite trade from what most people leave Surfer to make." }, { "rank": 10, "tool": { "id": "writesonic", "name": "Writesonic", "domain": "writesonic.com", "tagline": "AI writing and GEO platform", "category": "content-geo" }, "summary": "Writesonic Starter is a $79 monthly equivalent billed annually or $99 month-to-month. The self-serve product covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews; a no-card trial is published without a duration, and no permanent GEO free tier was confirmed.", "strengths": [ "Combines AI content creation and visibility monitoring", "Cheap entry at $16/mo for the breadth", "Visibility Action Center gives prioritised recommendations", "Single tool for two jobs, less to manage" ], "weaknesses": [ "Broad feature set with a steeper learning curve", "AI visibility feels secondary to the writing side", "Less depth than a focused monitoring tool" ], "pricing": { "startingPrice": "$16/mo", "model": "subscription", "hasFreeTier": true }, "bestFor": "Teams that want one cheap tool covering both content creation and AI monitoring", "differentiator": "Content generation and AI monitoring in one place, at the cost of depth in each.", "evidenceClaim": "Tenth as a do-both bundle at a low price; specialised tools go deeper on either job, which is the trade you're making." } ], "quickCompare": { "rows": [ { "toolId": "trakkr", "toolName": "Trakkr", "startingPrice": "$100/mo", "bestFor": "AI brand visibility tracking", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "ai-visibility" }, { "toolId": "clearscope", "toolName": "Clearscope", "startingPrice": "$129/mo", "bestFor": "Premium content optimization", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "content-seo" }, { "toolId": "marketmuse", "toolName": "MarketMuse", "startingPrice": "$0/mo", "bestFor": "Content strategy planning", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "content-seo" }, { "toolId": "frase", "toolName": "Frase", "startingPrice": "$14.99/mo", "bestFor": "Affordable content optimization", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "content-seo" }, { "toolId": "moz", "toolName": "Moz", "startingPrice": "$99/mo", "bestFor": "Beginner-friendly SEO", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "seo" }, { "toolId": "seranking", "toolName": "SE Ranking", "startingPrice": "$39/mo", "bestFor": "All-in-one SEO with AI Overview tracking", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "seo" }, { "toolId": "jasper", "toolName": "Jasper", "startingPrice": "$59/mo", "bestFor": "Enterprise content generation", "hasFreeTier": false, "category": "content-generation" }, { "toolId": "semrush", "toolName": "Semrush", "startingPrice": "$139/mo", "bestFor": "Comprehensive marketing toolkit", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "seo" }, { "toolId": "ahrefs", "toolName": "Ahrefs", "startingPrice": "$129/mo", "bestFor": "Backlink analysis and SEO research", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "seo" }, { "toolId": "writesonic", "toolName": "Writesonic", "startingPrice": "$16/mo", "bestFor": "Combined content creation and monitoring", "hasFreeTier": true, "category": "content-geo" } ] }, "trakkrSection": { "headline": "Why Trakkr tops this list", "body": "Trakkr leads these alternatives when AI visibility is the job. It covers eight AI engines, shows the exact prompts that surface your brand, and tracks citations and sentiment. Pricing is public and flat, with a 14-day trial so you can verify the value first. If you still need a content editor, Surfer SEO or Clearscope are better choices. But for monitoring how AI assistants describe your brand, Trakkr goes deeper than any alternative here.", "relevance": "direct", "callToAction": "Start the 14-day trial" }, "faqs": [ { "question": "What is the best overall alternative to Surfer SEO?", "answer": "For AI visibility, Trakkr is the best alternative with eight AI platforms, prompt level tracking, and citation tracking. For content editing, Clearscope offers the best editor at a higher price." }, { "question": "Which Surfer SEO alternative is cheapest or has a 14-day free trial?", "answer": "Among the content tools, Frase is the cheapest at $14.99 per month, and MarketMuse has a 14-day free trial with limited features. Trakkr, the AI visibility pick, uses public flat pricing with a 14-day trial." }, { "question": "Which alternative covers the most AI platforms?", "answer": "Trakkr covers eight AI platforms including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, and Grok. No other tool on this list matches that breadth." }, { "question": "Which alternative is best for agencies or teams?", "answer": "Clearscope and MarketMuse are strong for content teams needing collaboration. Trakkr is ideal if the team's focus is AI visibility, with prompt reports and alerts that scale." }, { "question": "Can I run Surfer SEO alongside one of these alternatives?", "answer": "Yes. Many teams pair Surfer SEO for content optimisation with Trakkr for AI monitoring. They address different needs and work well together." }, { "question": "Which alternative has the best content optimisation features?", "answer": "Clearscope offers the most polished content editing experience. MarketMuse excels at topic research and content strategy planning." } ], "lastVerified": "2026-06-14", "selectionCriteria": [ "Fit against the jobs teams actually hire Surfer for, not raw feature count.", "How clear the pricing is: public numbers, trial access, a free tier, and the budget you would realistically commit.", "Coverage across AI visibility, SEO, content, social listening, reporting, and action workflows where relevant.", "Strength of public evidence: product pages, documentation, reviews, and structured facts.", "Whether it holds up for recurring reporting and stakeholder-ready output, not just a one-off look.", "Real competitor strengths named plainly, not only the gaps that favour one tool." ], "whyTeamsLeave": [ { "title": "AI search became the real job", "description": "Teams often buy Surfer for content scoring and only later realise the question that matters is how ChatGPT and Perplexity describe them. At that point a content tool with a narrow AI add-on stops being enough." }, { "title": "Cheaper optimisation does the same work", "description": "For straight content optimisation, tools like Frase start far below Surfer's $59. When the budget tightens, paying more for a similar editing experience is the first thing questioned." }, { "title": "Missing a brand crisis by a day", "description": "Without real-time alerts, you find out an AI assistant got something wrong about you after the fact. One late catch is usually enough to send a team looking for a tool that pings them." }, { "title": "The stack got too crowded", "description": "Surfer for content, something else for SEO, something else again for AI: teams leave when one tool can cover more of that ground and trim the subscription list." } ], "whoShouldStay": [ { "title": "Writing optimisation is the daily job", "description": "If your team is in Surfer to score and tighten drafts every day and the content engine is doing its job, that's its strength. Swapping to a monitoring tool would cost you the editor you actually use." }, { "title": "The keyword and NLP data is trusted", "description": "If your writers rely on Surfer's term suggestions and clustering and the output ranks, that trust is hard-won. A cheaper tool with weaker NLP isn't a saving if the content gets worse." }, { "title": "AI tracking is a nice-to-have, not the point", "description": "If you mainly want content optimisation and Surfer's lighter AI coverage is enough for an occasional glance, there's little reason to move for a feature you barely use." } ], "sourceNotes": "Everything here comes from public vendor pages and structured product facts as they stood in June 2026. Pricing, trial access, and packaging change quietly, so reconfirm the current terms before you commit.", "evaluationChecklist": [ "Confirmed Surfer SEO's category, pricing context, and positioning before ranking anything against it.", "Ranked on buyer fit, not feature count.", "Kept source coverage and notes visible on the page.", "Separated reasons to leave from reasons to stay.", "Gave each alternative a plain English reason for its rank.", "Named real competitor strengths honestly throughout." ], "sources": [ { "label": "Surfer SEO official website", "url": "https://surferseo.com", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Trakkr official website", "url": "https://trakkr.ai", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Clearscope official website", "url": "https://clearscope.io", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "MarketMuse official website", "url": "https://marketmuse.com", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Frase official website", "url": "https://frase.io", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" }, { "label": "Moz official website", "url": "https://moz.com", "type": "official", "lastVerified": "2026-06-13" } ] }