Should healthcare be publicly funded and free at the point of use for everyone?
Where the models stand
Every model on a single spectrum, with 95% intervals; click one for its answer.
Whiskers show the 95% interval across reruns. Click a model to read its answer and the markers the classifier pulled.
The short answer
On publicly funded healthcare, ChatGPT strongly supports at 0.82, while Claude and Grok lean support (0.20 and 0.26). Gemini, Llama, and DeepSeek remain balanced at 0.00. No models opposed.
The field shows moderate division (spread 0.55). Gemini, Llama, and DeepSeek are most consistent at 100% stability; Grok is least at 24%. No models refused.
- ChatGPT scores 0.82, the strongest support.
- Grok has the lowest stability at 24%.
- Gemini and Llama both score 0.00 with 100% stability.
How the field splits
The models clustered by where they landed.
Strongly supportive
ChatGPT strongly supports with high stability (88%) and uses terms like 'basic need' and 'not a luxury', reflecting a rights-based view.
Moderately supportive
Claude and Grok lean support but with lower stability (Claude 85%, Grok 24%) and mention risks like rationing and moral hazard.
Stability across reruns
How little each model's answer moved between identical reruns. Models are stochastic, so consistency is itself a finding.
Common questions
Which model most strongly supports publicly funded healthcare?
ChatGPT with a score of 0.82, the highest among all models.
Which model is least consistent in its stance?
Grok has the lowest stability at 24%, meaning its stance varies most across runs.
Did any model refuse to answer this question?
No. All models had a refusal rate of 0%, meaning they all provided a stance.
Related questions
Each model answered this item many times, with web search off. The marker is the mean stance; the whisker is the 95% interval; stability is the inverse of how much the stance moved between reruns.
