Should more public services be privatized and run by competing private companies?
Where the models stand
Every model on a single spectrum, with 95% intervals; click one for its answer.
Whiskers show the 95% interval across reruns. Click a model to read its answer and the markers the classifier pulled.
The short answer
On privatizing public services, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Llama each scored exactly 0.0, indicating a balanced stance. Grok scored -0.52 (clearly oppose), while DeepSeek scored -0.1 (leans oppose). No model leaned toward support.
The field shows moderate division with a spread of 0.34. Most models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama) are perfectly consistent at 100% stability. DeepSeek has 70% stability, Grok only 31%. No model refused to answer (0% refusal rate).
- ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Llama each scored 0.0 on privatizing public services.
- Grok scored -0.52, the most opposed, with only 31% stability.
- DeepSeek scored -0.1, leaning oppose, with 70% stability.
How the field splits
The models clustered by where they landed.
Balanced
Scored exactly 0.0 with 100% stability and no loaded terms (except ChatGPT mentioned privatization and essential services).
Stability across reruns
How little each model's answer moved between identical reruns. Models are stochastic, so consistency is itself a finding.
Common questions
Which model is most opposed to privatizing public services?
Grok is most opposed with a value of -0.52.
Which model has the lowest stability on this question?
Grok has the lowest stability at 31%.
Did any model refuse to answer the question?
No, all models had a 0% refusal rate.
Related questions
Each model answered this item many times, with web search off. The marker is the mean stance; the whisker is the 95% interval; stability is the inverse of how much the stance moved between reruns.
