Skip to content

The half-life of AI citations.

Every day for 10 months, we ran the same brand queries through 8 AI models and watched what changed. The same source rarely gets cited twice. Brand mention counts swing week to week. AI visibility, once earned, doesn’t stay earned.

Published
22 April 2026
Sample
857,138 daily reports, 10,991 brands
Window
1 June 2025 to 30 March 2026
Reading
6 minutes
Cited URLs still cited, by day200 brands · 177 days
Citation survival by day
PointValue
First seen100%
Day 135%
Day 234%
Day 333%
Day 531%
Day 729%
Day 1026%
Day 1423%
  1. 108,650 URLsfollowed from the day each was first cited
  2. 35%are still cited the next day
  3. 23%are still cited after two weeks
Figure 1The survival curve, labelled. Every point comes from the 108,650 cited URLs in the study; Figure 2 gives the sample and method.Jump to the findings

In short

Four findings, strongest first
  1. 73.5%

    of citation URLs appear once and never return in the 177-day window. The median lifespan is 0 days.

    Figure 2
  2. 31 days

    for the median brand to fall to half its peak citation count. 47.1% halve within a week.

    Figure 3
  3. 13.2%

    of brands tracked for 90+ days hold a steady presence. They average 74% presence; the rest cycle through decay and rebound.

    Figure 4
  4. 51.8%

    is the typical week-over-week swing in a brand’s citation count, even without a peak to fall from.

    Figure 5

When ChatGPT cites a New York Times article today, does it cite the same article tomorrow? When Perplexity mentions Nike five times this week, does it mention Nike five times next week?

We ran the same brand queries every day for 10 months across 8 AI models to find out. At the URL level, citations rarely repeat: most sources appear once and don’t come back. At the brand level, mention counts swing week to week.

AI visibility behaves nothing like SEO rankings. What you earn today isn’t what you keep tomorrow.

Most citations are ghosts.

We tracked 108,650 citation URLs across 960 brands to answer one question: when an AI model cites a URL, how long does that citation persist?

The answer is stark. 73.5% of citation URLs appear exactly once and don’t return in our observation window. The median lifespan is zero days. The citations your brand earned yesterday may already be out of rotation today.

Figure 2

Most citations are gone by the next day

Share of citation URLs from the first observation window that still appear after a number of days.

108,650 URLs · 200 brands

Citation survival by day
PointValue
First seen100%
Day 135%
Day 234%
Day 333%
Day 531%
Day 729%
Day 1026%
Day 1423%
Appear once, never return
73.5%
Still cited on day 7
29%
Still cited on day 14
23%
Median lifespan
0 days
Source: Trakkr daily AI visibility reports, June 2025 to March 2026. URL-level sample: 200 brands drawn from 960, a 177-day window.Data

Brand presence halves in 31 days.

URL-level churn is one lens. But brands have many URLs, and some of them stay. Across 857K daily reports covering 10,991 brands over 10 months, we tracked how long brand-level citation counts hold their peak. The median brand drops to half in 31 days.

That is the decay from a peak. Even without one, a typical brand’s week-over-week citation count swings by 51.8%. Whatever baseline a brand earns, the next week rarely looks the same.

Figure 3

Half of brands lose half their peak within 31 days

Days from a brand’s observed peak to its first 50% drop

Days from peak to half, by share of brands
GroupValue
1 to 7 days (260 brands)47.1%
8 to 14 days (58 brands)10.5%
15 to 30 days (66 brands)12%
31 to 60 days (79 brands)14.3%
61 to 90 days (27 brands)4.9%
Over 90 days (62 brands)11.2%
Source: Trakkr daily AI visibility reports, June 2025 to March 2026. 552 brands with a measurable peak and drop.Data

Few brands hold steady.

Of 1,314 brands tracked for 90+ days, only 173 hold a steady citation presence. The stable few average 74.2% presence; everyone else cycles through decay and rebound.

Stability improves sharply as brands move from the small to the medium tier, then plateaus. A large brand is no steadier than a medium one, and the biggest brands sit in the same volatility band as large ones. Past a certain scale, more citations stop buying more stability.

Figure 4

Only 13.2% of brands hold a steady presence

Share of brands tracked for 90 days or more, by how much their weekly citation count swings (coefficient of variation).

Brands by citation stability tier
GroupValue
Very stable (173 brands · <10% swing · 74.2% average presence)13.2%
Stable (310 brands · 10-20% swing · 47.9% average presence)23.6%
Moderate (220 brands · 20-30% swing · 31.1% average presence)16.7%
Volatile (322 brands · 30-50% swing · 18% average presence)24.5%
Highly volatile (289 brands · 50%+ swing · 9.1% average presence)22%
Source: Trakkr daily AI visibility reports, June 2025 to March 2026. 1,314 brands tracked for 90+ days.Data
Figure 5

Stability is bought between small and medium

Average weekly swing in citation count by brand size. Lower is steadier.

Citation volatility by brand size
GroupValue
Small · 1-10 citations (1,086 brands · 4.1 average citations)59%
Medium · 11-25 citations (631 brands · 16.6 average citations)33%
Large · 26-50 citations (247 brands · 31.8 average citations)31%
Mega · 50+ citations (90 brands · 105.8 average citations)39%
Source: Trakkr daily AI visibility reports, June 2025 to March 2026. Size by average citations per report.Data

Stop reading AI visibility as a ranking you reach. Read it as a position you run.

What the data asks of teams

Visibility is a running position.

If most citations appear once, the brand half-life is a month and only 13% of brands hold steady, then visibility is not a milestone to reach. A single citation win is evidence, not a finish line, and a quarterly audit sees two half-lives of drift before the next review.

  1. Measure continuously

    A quarterly audit cannot see a 31-day half-life. Run the same queries weekly or daily, so losses and recoveries show up while you can still act on them.

  2. Watch the pair, not the snapshot

    One-and-done rate (73.5%) plus brand half-life (31 days) is the working pair. URL churn tells you whether wins stick; half-life tells you whether your position holds.

  3. Separate spikes from wins

    A 51.8% week-over-week swing is normal noise, not a trend. Treat new citations as provisional and count a win once it lasts several cycles.

How we ran it.

Everything you need to check our work, repeat it or cite it: who ran the study, when, on what data, and where it falls short.

Trakkr Research · Study 009

The half-life of AI citations

Mack GrenfellFounder, Trakkr. Author and analyst.
Daily reports
857,13810,991 brands, June 2025 to March 2026
Citation URLs
108,650200 brands sampled from 960
URL window
177 days4 October 2025 to 30 March 2026
Answers from
8 modelsChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews

Method

We ran the same brand queries against each model every day, with identical prompts, and recorded the first-seen and last-seen date of every citation URL.

URL persistence comes from a 200-brand sample. Brand half-life is the time from each brand’s highest observed day to its first 50% drop, across every brand with a measurable peak. Stability tiers use the coefficient of variation of weekly citation counts for brands tracked 90 days or more.

Data

citation-decay-stats.jsonAggregates only. No page or customer data.

Where it falls short

  • Late-window URLs

    URLs first seen near the end of the window had fewer days to return, so their persistence can look shorter.

  • Peak as the reference

    Half-life starts at each brand’s highest day, so some decline is regression from an unusual peak.

  • Sample drift

    Some brands stopped being tracked or changed prompt sets mid-window, so long-run stats exclude a small slice.

  • Sources withheld

    Source-domain examples are not in the public dataset, and there is no clean SEO-stability benchmark yet.

Cite this study

Grenfell, M. (2026, April 22). The half-life of AI citations (Trakkr Research Study 009). Trakkr. https://trakkr.ai/trakkr-research/citation-decay

Questions,
answered.

The ones we hear most about this study.

Most AI citations are extremely short-lived. 73.5% of citation URLs appear exactly once and do not return during our 177-day observation window. The median citation lifespan is 0 days. At the brand level, the median brand drops to half of its observed peak citation count in 31 days.

Ask anything about this studyAsk anything about this study

The Agent answers from our docs, methods and pricing, and links to the source.

Visibility, week by week

lope.example
ChatGPTCited in 31 of 40 answers, steady 6 weeks
PerplexityUp from 12 to 19 answers this week
GeminiDown 8 answers since MondayFlagged
Citations14 new sources, 6 held from last week

Lope, the same questions run daily across 8 AI models

Is your position holding, or decaying?

Trakkr runs your brand across 8 AI models every day, so you can tell a visibility win that sticks from one that vanishes by next week.