Not sure where to start? Take a guided tour.
AI Site Grader
AI Query Scanner
llms.txt GeneratorHollisbridge Health
38of 40Young adults
Why AI picks it
- Names the age rangeHollisbridge Health example page
- Lists local plan detailsHollisbridge Health example guide
ChatGPT says
“Names the ages its programme serves.”
Help people find the right care through accurate AI answers.
See which programmes AI recommends by level of care, condition, market and payer question. Trace each answer to the facts and sources that shaped it, then route safe, approved fixes.
“Outpatient mental health programme for a young adult that accepts insurance near Raleigh”40 answers
See every shortlist you’re on.
Buyers ask the same thing a hundred ways, and each question gets its own picks. Track the questions that matter and see how far you are from the top.
Raleigh outpatient
Talven Care 1st, in 36 of 40
Residential care
Talven Care 1st, in 37 of 40
Treatment settings
Talven Care 2nd, in 31 of 40
Trauma-informed care
Talven Care 2nd, in 30 of 40
Raleigh outpatient
Talven Care 4th, in 14 of 40
- Talven Care
- Rivals
- Your gap to first
40 AI answers per question. Height shows how many named each brand.
Explore the evidenceGive AI a reason to pick you.
Trakkr reads the pages behind every pick. When AI can’t find what it needs, Trakkr writes the fix and ships it once you approve.
- You approve every change
- Ships to Shopify, WordPress, Webflow and GitHub
List outpatient ages and plans. Verify the details with the team before publishing.
Ship to WordPress+4expected
Talven Care
14of 40Raleigh outpatient
- Age and plan details are missing.Talven Care example page
“Outpatient mental health programme for a young adult that accepts insurance near Raleigh”40 answers
Follow every pick to your site.
Connect Google Analytics to see AI referral visits and landing pages. Recorded conversions depend on the events and values configured in your property.
30 days · AI referral visits
Mini bars show 30 days of AI visits.
Google Analytics attributionIllustrative behavioral health and addiction treatment groups example. All providers, products, answers, counts and results in this demo are fictional. Verify facts before using an example draft. Industry-specific evidence and measurement caveats follow below.
AI search for behavioral health, explained.
AI search for behavioral health and addiction treatment groups is the process of measuring whether a programme appears when someone asks an AI system about care, location, payer, level of care or fit. Useful measurement keeps the original question, market, answer, sources and verification status together. It does not diagnose, decide clinical suitability or promise availability. It shows admissions, growth and clinical-review teams where public information is incomplete, inconsistent or hard for an answer engine to verify.
No diagnosis or promise of fit, coverage or availability.
Tracked across
- ChatGPT
Google
Perplexity
Gemini
Care shortlist monitor
IllustrativeOutpatient mental health · Raleigh · commercial insurance question
Outpatient mental health programme for a young adult that accepts insurance near Raleigh
#4of 7
Executive signal
Talven Behavioral Health is named for young-adult care, but two directory records and the programme page do not agree on the payer verification route.
Access truth
61%
Sources aligned
4 / 7
Payer route
Unverified
Approved route
Publish one current Raleigh access page that separates programme scope, payer verification and the admissions contact route.
Fictional demo data. Public peer names are unmeasured and are not customers.
One nuanced question can narrow a very large market.
AI has to resolve care type, location, payer language and fit from public information before a person reaches admissions. Wrong or vague facts create a real access risk.
SAMHSA collects location, service and operating information across substance use and mental health treatment facilities. The category is large, and facility types can overlap, so an answer needs more precision than a brand-level score.
- 01Ask
A person combines need, care setting, location, payer and fit in one question.
- 02Shortlist
The answer names a small set of programmes before an admissions conversation begins.
- 03Verify
Programme pages, official records, payer directories, accreditors and local sources support or weaken the answer.
- 04Act
The gap goes to admissions, clinical review, compliance, local marketing or directory operations with a clear owner.
Open the full readout.
Switch views to see how Trakkr breaks down visibility for behavioral health and addiction treatment groups, from the market to the work that moves it.
Keep level of care, need, market and payer context attached.
A portfolio average cannot show whether a precise care question is supported by the right programme and access facts.
Harborline Behavioral Health
Fictional four-market treatment group
All visibility, programme, payer and access records below are fictional.
- Shortlist visibility
- 46.8
- +1.7 points across the fixed prompt set
- Access truth
- 61%
- Programme, directory and contact facts aligned
- Priority gaps
- 3
- Require admissions or compliance review
Level-of-care and condition visibility
One need can produce a different shortlist at each care setting.
| Need | Outpatient | IOP | Residential | Withdrawal | Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outpatient mental health | 76 | 58 | 29 | 18 | Connect condition pages to the correct outpatient programme and local intake route. |
| Young-adult co-occurring care | 48 | 63 | 41 | 22 | Clarify age range, programme setting and clinical-review boundary without promising fit. |
| Trauma-informed care | 54 | 46 | 37 | 20 | Define the approach on programme pages and support it with clinician-reviewed education. |
| Withdrawal management comparison | 24 | 31 | 52 | 69 | Explain the difference between withdrawal management and ongoing treatment in plain language. |
Outpatient mental health
- Outpatient
- 76
- IOP
- 58
- Residential
- 29
- Withdrawal
- 18
Connect condition pages to the correct outpatient programme and local intake route.
Young-adult co-occurring care
- Outpatient
- 48
- IOP
- 63
- Residential
- 41
- Withdrawal
- 22
Clarify age range, programme setting and clinical-review boundary without promising fit.
Trauma-informed care
- Outpatient
- 54
- IOP
- 46
- Residential
- 37
- Withdrawal
- 20
Define the approach on programme pages and support it with clinician-reviewed education.
Withdrawal management comparison
- Outpatient
- 24
- IOP
- 31
- Residential
- 52
- Withdrawal
- 69
Explain the difference between withdrawal management and ongoing treatment in plain language.
Payer and location matrix
This verifies public information paths. It does not state that a plan is accepted.
MarketProgrammePayerDirectoryContactFinding
Raleigh, NC
Young adult outpatient
Young adult outpatient
Payer detailPartial
DirectoryAligned
Contact routeAligned
The page says insurance may be used, but the verification steps and plan-specific boundary are separated.
Atlanta, GA
Co-occurring IOP
Co-occurring IOP
Payer detailUnverified
DirectoryPartial
Contact routeAligned
AI answers repeat an old directory description that does not match the current programme name.
Nashville, TN
Adult residential
Adult residential
Payer detailAligned
DirectoryPartial
Contact routePartial
Payer language is clear, while the local admissions number differs between two public records.
Richmond, VA
Outpatient substance use care
Outpatient substance use care
Payer detailPartial
DirectoryUnverified
Contact routeAligned
The official programme page is current, but the trusted-directory path is not easy to verify.
View 1 of 5
Move from the executive signal to the exact evidence gap.
Choose a care question and an AI engine. The shortlist position, answer, sources, gap and next owner change together.
The prompt, engine, market and date stay attached so a change can be explained and reviewed.
Answer tracePosition #4
Buyer intent
Find a local programme, understand the care setting and verify how to check coverage.
Talven enters the shortlist for young-adult outpatient care, but its payer verification route is less explicit than two fictional local alternatives.
- Supports tracked entity
Raleigh programme page
Owned programme page
- Stale fact
FindTreatment.gov record
Federal directory
- Missing evidence
Fictional payer directory
Payer directory
Evidence gap
The owned page and directory record do not show one current path for checking plan-specific coverage.
Recommended work
Add a dated payer-verification section and link it from the programme and location pages.
Likely next event: Admissions route comparedAlternative: Rivermark Care Network
View 2 of 5
See which public facts the answer can safely repeat.
Owned pages start the fact chain. Official records, payer and accreditation sources, directories and local context test whether it holds together.
Source in the answer set
Harborline
Peer
Programme and location pagesSupporting
Owned truth
Core services are present, but the links between programme, location, care level and intake are uneven.
SAMHSA FindTreatment.govStale fact
Federal directory
Two illustrative records use older programme descriptions and need review before any directory update.
State licence and provider sourcesSupporting
Official record
Official entities support the locations, while programme-level wording needs a more precise owned source.
Payer provider directoriesCoverage gap
Access source
The demo reveals no complete source path for a plan-specific coverage question.
Accreditation directoriesMixed evidence
Accreditation
Accreditation must be verified at the correct organization or programme scope before it is repeated.
Reviews and local resourcesMixed evidence
Experience and locality
Local experience themes are visible, but they should not be treated as clinical evidence or outcome proof.
Evidence diagnosis
4 / 6 layers need work
The fastest route is not more content everywhere. It is one consistent fact chain from programme and location pages to official, payer, accreditation and directory records.
Service, payer and accreditation accuracy
Flag conflicts before an answer repeats them. Verification stays with the authorised clinical, admissions or compliance owner.
Raleigh young adult outpatient
Payer verification
The programme page and a directory record describe the coverage route differently.
State that coverage must be verified, name the verification steps and keep plan-specific claims out of general copy.
Conflicting information
Admissions and compliance
Nashville adult residential
Accreditation statement
A group-level accreditation statement lacks a visible scope and review date.
Verify the current organization or programme scope, then publish the exact wording and source date.
Review date needed
Compliance
Atlanta co-occurring IOP
Level of care
The location page does not define IOP or connect it to the programme entity.
Add a clinician-reviewed definition and link to the exact programme and intake route.
Missing verification path
Clinical content
Richmond outpatient programme
Access route
The programme, directory and local contact path use the same current phone and review date.
Keep the quarterly verification owner and retain the source record.
Aligned
Patient access
View 3 of 5
Compare access evidence without turning care into a scorecard.
Public names define the category only. Detailed scores remain fictional, while the language audit gives teams a concrete, safer edit path.
Illustrative public peer set
Names only, no Trakkr measurements
- Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation
- Acadia Healthcare
- Recovery Centers of America
- Newport Healthcare
Public names define a possible peer set. They are not customers, endorsements or measured records.
Fictional access comparison
Talven Behavioral Health
Multi-market behavioral health
18.7%
- Access clarity
- 61
- Source support
- 57
- Language
- 82
Rivermark Care Network
Outpatient and residential
24.4%
- Access clarity
- 78
- Source support
- 73
- Language
- 88
Clearview Care Group
Young adult programmes
21.1%
- Access clarity
- 84
- Source support
- 69
- Language
- 91
Northfield Recovery Network
Substance use treatment
15.3%
- Access clarity
- 66
- Source support
- 76
- Language
- 79
Language and stigma audit
Flag unclear or stigmatising wording before it enters more answers.
Legacy location page
Copy surface
Uses “addict” in a quoted historical testimonial.
Use person-first language and preserve the meaning without defining a person by a condition.
Replace
Withdrawal management FAQ
Copy surface
Uses “clean” as a status label.
Use precise language such as in recovery or testing negative, based on the intended meaning.
Replace
Young adult programme
Copy surface
Describes people as “clients with a substance use disorder”.
Keep the person-first wording and verify that related directory copy matches.
Supportive
Paid landing page
Copy surface
Promises a “perfect fit” before assessment.
Describe the assessment and admissions conversation without promising clinical suitability.
Review
View 4 of 5
Route each gap to the team that can verify and change it.
Prioritise accurate programme pages, access and payer details, clinician and facility entities, compassionate explainers, trusted directories and review governance.
Each action begins with a captured answer or source conflict and names the approval route before publication.
9 open · 3 high priority- 01
Unify the Raleigh payer-verification routeHigh
Programme, directory and payer-source language do not form one current access path.
Approval route
Admissions and compliance
Raleigh, NC
- 02
Define the Atlanta IOP at programme levelHigh
The location page names IOP without a reviewed definition, programme entity or next step.
Approval route
Clinical content
Atlanta, GA
- 03
Verify accreditation wording and scopeHigh
A group-level statement lacks the exact current scope and source date.
Approval route
Compliance
Nashville, TN
- 04
Publish a compassionate care-level explainerMedium
Legacy pages blur withdrawal management and continuing treatment.
Approval route
Clinical review and content
Portfolio
- 05
Create a directory review ownerMedium
No visible cadence connects approved programme changes to trusted-directory updates.
Approval route
Patient access operations
All markets
- 06
Replace stigmatising legacy languageMedium
Two crawlable surfaces use language that can create stigma or ambiguity.
Approval route
Clinical review and brand
Legacy content
View 5 of 5
Measure the question, answer, source and verification state.
That is the minimum useful record for improving AI discovery without presenting marketing data as clinical guidance.
- 01Define the care question
Keep condition or need, care level, age group, market and payer context attached without inferring a diagnosis.
- 02Capture the answer
Record whether the programme appears, the shortlist position, wording, alternatives and date for each AI engine.
- 03Trace the evidence
Map each material statement to owned pages, official records, trusted directories, payer sources, accreditation sources and local context.
- 04Verify before action
Route payer, accreditation, programme, clinician and access facts to the team authorised to approve them.
- 05Recheck the same prompt
Measure whether the source chain and answer changed without claiming that visibility proves clinical quality or outcomes.
Every product figure on this page is illustrative. Trakkr does not verify clinical suitability, diagnose, publish live availability or represent payer and accreditation status as current without an authorised source check.
Public sources behind the category
- SAMHSA2023 N-SUMHSS annual release (opens in a new tab)Federal facility survey covering location, characteristics, services and utilisation.
- FindTreatment.govTreatment locator help and listing fields (opens in a new tab)Explains location, service, payment, category and facility-detail fields used in the federal locator.
- ASAMAbout the ASAM Criteria (opens in a new tab)Describes the continuum and common language used to assess needs and discuss levels of care.
- SAMHSAStigma and language (opens in a new tab)Explains why negative attitudes and language can create barriers to seeking care.
- Joint CommissionBehavioral health accreditation programme (opens in a new tab)Official programme information and the scope of accredited behavioral health services.
- CARFFind an accredited provider (opens in a new tab)Official provider search with behavioral health programme filters.
Questions, answered.
What behavioral health teams ask before they start.
Trakkr measures whether a programme appears for a defined care question, where it ranks, what the answer says, which sources support it and which approved fact is missing. It keeps level of care, market, payer context and check date attached.
Ask anything elseAsk anything else
The Agent answers from our docs, methods and pricing, and links to the source.
Be the pick.
Add your website and the questions your buyers ask. Track the answers, inspect the evidence and decide which changes to make.
- 14-day free trial
- Cancel anytime
- You approve every change
Every question your buyers askchecked daily in eight AI models