AthenaHQ plans
and evidence.
Action-oriented GEO platform. Teams that want a free credit-based entry point and action or content-optimization workflows.
Read our AthenaHQ reviewWhat does AthenaHQ include?
Published entry plan. Higher plans may differ.
- Entry plan
- Essential
- Published entry price
- $0/mo
- Billing commitment
- Ongoing free plan
- Included engines
- 5 surfaces: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot
- Usage allowance
- 300 responses
Who it fits.
Worth a look when…
Teams that want a free credit-based entry point and action or content-optimization workflows.
What to check first
Prompt capacity is expressed as response credits, and Starter API access is a separately priced add-on.
Coverage and access.
Documented plan facts
5 surfaces: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot
- Citations
- Yes
- Crawler analytics
- Not publicly stated
- API on entry plan
- Higher plan
- Exports on entry plan
- Higher plan
- Agency on entry plan
- Higher plan
Legacy corpus flags
Recorded flags are historical inputs, not a current availability promise. “Not recorded” does not mean unavailable.
- ChatGPTRecorded
- ClaudeRecorded
- PerplexityRecorded
- GeminiRecorded
- Microsoft CopilotNot recorded
- Meta AINot recorded
- Google AI OverviewsRecorded
- GrokNot recorded
- AI mention trackingRecorded
- Citation trackingNot recorded
- Sentiment analysisNot recorded
- Prompt-level analyticsRecorded
- Competitor benchmarkingRecorded
- Real-time alertsRecorded
- Historical dataRecorded
- API accessNot recorded
- Custom promptsRecorded
The editorial record.
Recorded strengths
- Action-oriented recommendations
- GEO optimization workflows
- Real-time visibility alerts
- Starter publishes visibility across 11 AI models
- Focus on actionable insights
Recorded watch-outs
- Credit-based pricing can be unpredictable
- API access costs extra on Starter
- Newer platform, still maturing
- Credit usage makes the effective monthly cost variable
- Less established than competitors
Legacy company details, confirm before use: founded 2024 · USA · Not disclosed.
The legacy scoring proposal.
Unverified editorial estimate
No overall buying verdict
- Platform coverage
- 18.8 / 30
- Feature depth
- 16.7 / 25
- Category fit
- 20 / 20
- Accessibility
- 2 / 15
- Core-signal depth
- 6 / 10
What the assistants named.
The saved record names AthenaHQ in 6 of 17 tentpoles, with an average recorded rank of 4.5. Named by perplexity.
Sources and corrections.
Source register
- AthenaHQ plans and pricingChecked 2026-10-01
- AthenaHQ for agenciesChecked 2026-10-01
- AthenaHQ trust centreChecked 2026-08-18
Checked 1 Oct 2026. Confidence: high. Evidence: official documentation review.
Ownership and method
Trakkr owns and publishes this profile. No competitor paid for placement. The official fact dataset was checked on 5 Oct 2026; legacy corpus generation is labelled separately.
Send an official source and the affected claim to [email protected].
Know where you stand first.
Measure how AI answers mention, cite and rank your brand. Inspect the evidence before you choose a platform.
Start free trialCheck one site