Moz plans
and evidence.
SEO software and data. Buyers comparing Moz with a specialist AI visibility platform.
What does Moz include?
Published entry plan. Higher plans may differ.
- Entry plan
- Published entry
- Published entry price
- $49/mo
- Billing commitment
- Monthly
- Included engines
- Plan-level engine list is not maintained for this comparison-only record
- Usage allowance
- Not publicly stated for this plan
Who it fits.
Worth a look when…
Buyers comparing Moz with a specialist AI visibility platform.
What to check first
Entry is $49 month to month; Standard is $99 monthly or $79 monthly equivalent billed annually. Plan-level usage and capability limits remain explicit unknowns until verified.
Coverage and access.
Documented plan facts
Plan-level engine list is not maintained for this comparison-only record
- Citations
- Not publicly stated
- Crawler analytics
- Not publicly stated
- API on entry plan
- Not publicly stated
- Exports on entry plan
- Not publicly stated
- Agency on entry plan
- Not publicly stated
Legacy corpus flags
Recorded flags are historical inputs, not a current availability promise. “Not recorded” does not mean unavailable.
- ChatGPTNot recorded
- ClaudeNot recorded
- PerplexityNot recorded
- GeminiNot recorded
- Microsoft CopilotNot recorded
- Meta AINot recorded
- Google AI OverviewsNot recorded
- GrokNot recorded
- AI mention trackingNot recorded
- Citation trackingNot recorded
- Sentiment analysisNot recorded
- Prompt-level analyticsNot recorded
- Competitor benchmarkingRecorded
- Real-time alertsRecorded
- Historical dataRecorded
- API accessRecorded
- Custom promptsNot recorded
The editorial record.
Recorded strengths
- Industry-standard Domain Authority metric
- Excellent educational resources
- User-friendly interface for beginners
- Strong local SEO features
- Affordable entry point
Recorded watch-outs
- No AI platform monitoring
- Smaller link index than Ahrefs
- Fewer features than Semrush
- Traditional search focus only
Legacy company details, confirm before use: founded 2004 · Seattle, USA.
The legacy scoring proposal.
Unverified editorial estimate
No overall buying verdict
- Platform coverage
- 0 / 30
- Feature depth
- 11.1 / 25
- Category fit
- 6 / 20
- Accessibility
- 15 / 15
- Core-signal depth
- 2 / 10
What the assistants named.
The saved record names Moz in 6 of 17 tentpoles, with an average recorded rank of 3.3. Named by claude.
Sources and corrections.
Source register
Checked 1 Sep 2026. Confidence: high. Evidence: official documentation review.
Ownership and method
Trakkr owns and publishes this profile. No competitor paid for placement. The official fact dataset was checked on 5 Oct 2026; legacy corpus generation is labelled separately.
Send an official source and the affected claim to [email protected].
Know where you stand first.
Measure how AI answers mention, cite and rank your brand. Inspect the evidence before you choose a platform.
Start free trialCheck one site