Consumer ranking
Brawny ranks first for toilet paper
In the latest daily observation, Brawny leads 15 ranked brands. This answer comes from 30 observed brand mentions, updated 18 August 2026.
Household paper recommendations across comfort, value and sustainability.
[01]Evidence
The sample is the sum of current observed brand mentions in this category.
Ranked brands
15
Distinct source rows
Observed mentions
30
Latest daily observation
Leader score
91.3
0-100 visibility score
Updated
18 August 2026
Source feed timestamp
[02]Toilet paper ranking
Mention share is calculated from this category’s current observed mentions.
| Rank | Brand | Visibility | Mentions | Mention share | Average position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brawny | 91.3 | 1 | 3.3% | 2.0 |
| 2 | Cottonelle | 87.1 | 4 | 13.3% | 2.3 |
| 3 | Procter & Gamble | 73.5 | 5 | 16.7% | 2.6 |
| 4 | Angel | 56.3 | 2 | 6.7% | 3.5 |
| 5 | Scott | 42.3 | 2 | 6.7% | 4.5 |
| 6 | Who Gives A Crap | 36.0 | 2 | 6.7% | 5.0 |
| 7 | Presto! Ultra-Soft | 36.0 | 1 | 3.3% | 5.0 |
| 8 | Quilted Northern | 20.3 | 2 | 6.7% | 6.5 |
| 9 | Seventh Generation | 16.0 | 3 | 10.0% | 7.0 |
| 10 | Kirkland Signature Yogurt | 16.0 | 2 | 6.7% | 7.0 |
| 11 | Kleenex | 16.0 | 2 | 6.7% | 7.0 |
| 12 | Amazon | 4.0 | 1 | 3.3% | 9.0 |
| 13 | Georgia-Pacific | 4.0 | 1 | 3.3% | 9.0 |
| 14 | Great Value | 4.0 | 1 | 3.3% | 9.0 |
| 15 | Up&Up | 1.0 | 1 | 3.3% | 10.0 |
Category movement is not available in the public feed, so this page does not infer it. Visibility is a source score, not mention share.
[03]Method and limits
Measured fields and editorial explanation are kept separate.
How this ranking is built
Trakkr groups observed AI answers by category, counts brand appearances, and ranks brands using the source feed’s 0–100 visibility score. The score reflects frequency and prominence; raw mentions and average position are shown beside it.
- Time window
- Latest daily observation, dated 18 August 2026.
- Source-named coverage
- ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity.
- Limits
- The public feed has no prompt list, per-model split or citation-level evidence. Results describe observed visibility, not quality or market share.
Source and corrections
The table is read from Trakkr’s public ranking feed. If a row looks wrong, use the source JSON to report the exact category, brand and update date.
Open source JSON