Which AI platforms does Profound track on each plan?
A current plan-by-plan map of Profound model coverage, daily tracked prompts, Prompt Volumes platform limits, regional gates, historical changes, and the Trakkr comparison.
Quick answer
Which AI engines does Profound monitor, and what coverage will a buyer actually receive?
Profound coverage depends on the plan and dataset. Starter monitors ChatGPT. Growth monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Enterprise advertises up to nine engines, adding Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, and Claude. Prompt Volumes is narrower: its US conversation dataset names ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity, with other countries varying. Put required engines, regions, and languages in the contract.
Key facts and evidence
- Starter
- ChatGPT onlyEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison
- Growth
- ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI OverviewsEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison
- Enterprise
- Up to nine named answer enginesEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison
- Prompt frequency
- Daily on all three Profound plan levelsEvidence: Profound prompt tracking tool, Profound pricing and plan comparison
- Prompt Volumes
- Four platforms documented for US conversation data; country coverage variesEvidence: About Prompt Volumes, Prompt Volumes FAQ
Profound and Trakkr platform coverage
| Coverage question | Profound | Trakkr | Buyer implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry plan | Starter tracks ChatGPT | All eight named models run on every plan | Trakkr provides broader self-serve model coverageEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison, Trakkr Quick Start, Trakkr Prompts documentation |
| Mid-tier plan | Growth tracks three engines | Coverage remains eight models | Profound buyers need Enterprise for Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot, or AI Mode trackingEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison, Trakkr Core Concepts |
| Broadest named set | Up to nine on Enterprise, including Copilot and Google AI Mode | Eight, including Meta AI but not Copilot or Google AI Mode | Profound has the broader named enterprise set; Trakkr has broader standard-plan accessEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison, Trakkr Core Concepts |
| Cadence | Daily prompt execution | Daily prompt execution | Cadence is similar; plan coverage is the larger differenceEvidence: Profound prompt tracking tool, Profound pricing and plan comparison, Trakkr Quick Start, Trakkr Prompts documentation |
| Panel conversation data | US Prompt Volumes names ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity | No equivalent panel-demand dataset documented | Profound is the fit when real-conversation demand research mattersEvidence: About Prompt Volumes, Prompt Volumes FAQ |
| Regions and languages | One region and language on self-serve; custom on Enterprise | Eight-model coverage is documented across plans | Confirm exact geography separately from engine entitlementEvidence: Profound pricing and plan comparison, Trakkr Quick Start, Trakkr Prompts documentation |
Coverage checked against current official pricing and documentation on 25 August 2026. Product access and Prompt Volumes conversation-data coverage are separate entitlements.
What is the exact Profound engine list by plan?
Starter is ChatGPT only. Growth adds Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. The current Enterprise capability list contains ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Claude, and Google AI Overviews.
The plan table says up to nine, not that every Enterprise contract automatically contains every engine. Buyers should make the required platforms an explicit entitlement rather than relying on the broad product list.
Does Prompt Volumes cover the same nine platforms?
No. Profound's current Prompt Volumes documentation names ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity for United States conversation data. Other countries can have fewer platforms, and the history start date also changes by model and region.
This means a buyer can have Answer Engine Insights tracking on a platform without receiving matching real-conversation volume data for that platform.
Has Profound's published platform list changed over time?
Yes. A July 2025 Profound post announcing DeepSeek named Meta AI in a nine-engine list. The current pricing page names Claude instead of Meta AI. The present pricing page is the better source for a current comparison, but the change shows why a contract should list engines by name.
How should a global team validate regions and languages?
Profound publishes one region and one language on Starter and Growth, with custom coverage on Enterprise. Prompt Volumes coverage also varies by country. Ask for a matrix that pairs each engine with each required market, language, product module, run cadence, and history start date.
Evidence and method
The public pricing table names the plan boundary
Profound's current plan table clearly separates one-engine Starter, three-engine Growth, and an up-to-nine Enterprise capability list.
Evidence: Profound pricing and plan comparisonPrompt Volumes has its own coverage rule
Official documentation limits the named US panel dataset to four platforms and warns that other country coverage can differ.
Evidence: About Prompt Volumes, Prompt Volumes FAQHistorical product lists reveal change risk
Profound's own 2025 launch post and 2026 pricing page name different ninth engines, supporting contract-level platform verification.
Evidence: Introducing support for DeepSeek, Profound pricing and plan comparisonVerification: partially verified. Public materials show the named platform mix changed after launch. Enterprise buyers should put the exact required engines in the order form.Trakkr publishes a simpler standard entitlement
Trakkr's current documentation names eight models and says every active prompt runs on all eight daily regardless of plan.
Evidence: Trakkr Core Concepts, Trakkr Quick Start, Trakkr Prompts documentationHow we checked this page
We treated monitored-answer coverage, Prompt Volumes conversation coverage, geography, language, and cadence as separate fields, then checked current and historical first-party lists for changes.
- 1. Read the current Profound pricing table and Prompt Volumes documentation for named platforms, plan gates, regions, languages, cadence, and history.
- 2. Compared the current platform list with Profound's historical DeepSeek launch post to identify a material naming change.
- 3. Checked Trakkr coverage only against current Trakkr documentation on the same verification date.
- Limitation: We did not inspect a live Enterprise workspace or a negotiated order form, so custom enablement remains contract-specific.
- Limitation: Answer-engine names, surfaces, and regional availability can change after the verification date.
When is Trakkr or Profound the better platform-coverage fit?
Trakkr is the clearer fit when a buyer wants broad self-serve monitoring without an Enterprise coverage gate. It names eight models and runs every active prompt across all eight on every plan.
Profound can be stronger for an Enterprise team that specifically needs Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, or Prompt Volumes conversation research. Its current Enterprise list reaches nine named engines, but model, market, language, and panel-data entitlements should be confirmed together.
Yes, the current pricing page lists Anthropic Claude as an Enterprise capability. Claude is not listed on Starter or Growth, and it also appears in the United States Prompt Volumes dataset.
Growth includes Google AI Overviews. Enterprise lists both Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. Starter is limited to ChatGPT.
Answer Engine Insights prompts run daily across the platforms enabled for the account. Prompt Volumes is different and refreshes weekly, with public latency wording that currently conflicts.
Trakkr names Meta AI among its eight models. Profound's current Enterprise pricing list names Microsoft Copilot and Google AI Mode instead, while a historical Profound post did name Meta AI.
Sources and related reading
See how AI talks about your brand
Enter your domain to get a free AI visibility report in under 60 seconds.